The 'real Presence' of High Church Receptionism

Referring to the Hackney divines (the early 19th century High Church fraternity) Nockles notes that while they did come under the influence of Virtualism, "the effect on them was not permanent - they came to prefer the rival doctrine of receptionism".  Rather than regarding this, however, as embracing a 'lower' doctrine of the Eucharist, we might consider James Smith's description of the "dynamic receptionist interpretation" within the High Church tradition.

In his 1814 Bampton Lectures, Van Mildert, a member of the Hackney Phalanx, summarised High Church Receptionism with his paraphrase of the words of Institution:

This Bread represents my Body, and this Wine represents my Blood: and this act of receiving Bread and Wine, according to my Institution and by virtue of its efficacy through Me, is, to the faithful communicant, the act of spiritually receiving my Body and Blood; that is, of receiving the benefits of the sacrifice which I am about to offer, in giving my Body, and shedding my Blood, for the remission of sins.

Contrasting this with those views which resulted in "the ordinance being reduced to a bare commemorative act, or a sign unaccompanied with the benefits of the thing signified", van Mildert applied the term 'real Presence' to High Church Receptionism:

Accordingly, in her Communion Office, although the very words of Scripture are adhered to in the Consecration and the Administration of the Elements, yet they are so applied in other parts of the Service, as to make it impossible to understand them in any other than a metaphorical sense: and while the doctrines of Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation are virtually disclaimed, that of the real Presence, spiritually, mystically, and sacramentally understood, is no less clearly implied.

In footnotes, he quotes from the 1728-29 Lady Moyer lectures of High Church theologian Henry Felton, from which he appears to have derived the use of 'real Presence':

These expressions are to be understood in a figurative, symbolical, and commemorative sense, so that the Bread and the Cup are a real Communion of his Body and Blood. The outward part, or visible sign of this Sacrament, is, as our Church Catechism teacheth, Bread and Wine; the inward part, or thing signified, is the body and blood of Christ, which is verily and indeed taken and received, in all their real and spiritual effects, by the Faithful. This is the real Presence, which we hold. He is so present, as to annex the very benefits of his Body and Blood to our Communion of the Bread and Wine, which are now made the spiritual food and nourishment of our souls; that as He loved us and gave Himself for us, we might ever be partakers of, and give thanks unto Him for his unspeakable gift.

Van Mildert's affirmation that "the full sense of the words of Institution is undoubtedly mystical" indicates that High Church Receptionism was no less richly sacramental than Virtualism, worthy of Smith's use of the term "dynamic".   Contrary to the later Tractarian (rather absurd) attempt to deny that Receptionism was ever a High Church doctrine, it was the majority High Church eucharistic understanding throughout the 18th century and into the 19th, giving expression to and sustaining a vibrant sacramental piety.  Above all, High Church Receptionism was no cold, bare affair, but proclaimed - in Van Mildert's words - "the deeper signification" of the words of Institution, the "hidden or spiritual intent in the action itself".  In other words, "the real Presence", "the means of imparting to the communicant the benefits of our Lord's death and passion".

(All quotations are from Van Mildert's 1814 Bampton Lectures, found in The Theological Works of William Van Mildert, Volume IV.)