Skip to main content

"We vary little from them": an early 18th century High Church view of Lutheranism

William Dawes, Archbishop of York 1714-24, Tory Hanoverian and High Churchman, was author of An Exact Account of King George's Religion (1715), a defence of George I's Lutheranism.  As such, it provides an interesting insight into early 18th century High Church attitudes towards the Lutheran churches.  

Dawes begins by praising Luther, while noting how Anglicans "differ from him in some points" - a qualification which can be heard a few times in the tract - before turning to emphasise the doctrinal and liturgical similarities between Lutheranism and Anglicanism:

this Great and Good Man, to whom notwithstanding we of the Church of England Established by Law differ from him in some points, to we owe Deliverance from our blind Obedience to the Church of Rome; it will not be amiss to take View of the Liturgy that is us'd by his Followers, in order to make appear that there is not such a wide distance between the Doctrines professed by them, and the Rules for down for the Celebrating Divine Service in our Book of Common Prayer.

Turning to the two Sacraments, Dawes points to Lutherans and Anglicans using the same forms and ceremonies, albeit with an acknowledgement that the Lutheran insistence on Consubstantiation was a point of difference (a reminder that High Church Eucharistic theology belonged to the Reformed family):

They likewise have Collects and Epistles after the same manner as they are in use with us, and Receive the Eucharist and Blessed Sacrament kneeling, and making use of the same Form as in our Liturgy, but differ from us in holding the the Doctrine of Consubstantiation. Their Method of Baptizing with Water and the Sign of the Cross is also the same ours. 

Dawes follows this recognition of shared rites and ceremonies with a further qualification, noting that Lutherans "are not only more abundant in their at Ceremonies, but in the Pomp and Splendour of their Churches".  This, however, he regards not primarily as a difficulty for Anglicans but for Non-conformists making claims that the Hanoverian dynasty will favour them:

the Lutheran Religion, so far differs from the Presbyterians, & the Persuasions of other Sectaries and the Dissenters from the Established Church, that it carries matters much higher than her.

He concludes by restating the liturgical and doctrinal similarities between Anglicans and Lutherans, embodied in the Hanoverian dynasty:

since we vary very little from them in the Exercise of our Publick Devotion, 'tis hoped such as have entertain'd Notions of Persons of this persuasion [i.e. George I favouring Non-conformists] will see their Error and be convinced that since the Subjects of Hanover and we are under one Head, and hold many of the same Doctrines, we shall live together as Brethren that are at Unity among ourselves.

There is much here which reflects earlier Conformist, Laudian, and Restoration thinking on the importance of Lutheranism as an expression of Protestantism sharing many features in common with Anglicanism.  The fact that this understanding was perpetuated by the High Church tradition into the early 18th century exemplifies the continuity which would lead to Horsley at the opening of the 19th century making similar assertions.  Such openness to Lutheranism was, in other words, an enduring characteristic of the Laudian and High Church traditions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...