Skip to main content

A classically Anglican celebration of Saint Hilary of Poitiers

Three classically Anglican reasons to rejoice on the commemoration of Saint Hilary of Poitiers.

1. In the midst of January, with the Sundays after the Epiphany sustaining the Church's joy in Our Lord Jesus Christ, "who in substance of our mortal flesh manifested forth his glory: That he might bring all men out of darkness into his own marvellous light" (Epiphany preface, Prayer Book as Proposed in 1928), commemorating Saint Hilary of Poitiers is a means of renewing our vision of the grace and truth of the Incarnation. In his discussion of the union of divine and human natures in the Incarnate Word, Richard Hooker turns to Saint Hilary's De Trinitate

 "He which in himself was appointed", saith Hilary, "a Mediator to save his Church, and for performance of that mystery of mediation between God and man, is become God and man, doth now being but one consist of both those natures united, neither hath he through the union of both incurred the damage or loss of either, lest by being born a man we should think he hath given over to be God, or that because he continueth God, therefore he cannot be man also, whereas the true belief which maketh a man happy proclaimeth jointly God and man, confesseth the Word and flesh together" (LEP V.53.2).

With Hooker, then, let us drink deeply of this confession of the Incarnate Lord, and through the example, teaching, and fellowship of Saint Hilary be renewed in a joyful confession of Creedal truth.

2. The 'Homily of Salvation' in  Book of Homilies turns first to Saint Hilary when it quotes representatives of "all the old and ancient authors, both Greeks and Latins", placing Hilary in the illustrious company of Saint Basil and Saint Ambrose. The words of Hilary, fides enim sola justificat ('faith only justifieth'), recall us in this Epiphany season to the heart of the mystery of the Incarnation celebrated at Christmas and the Epiphany, and proclaimed in the Creed: "Who for us men, and for our salvation, came down from heaven".  In the words of the 'Homily of Salvation':

But this saying, That we be justified by faith only, freely and without works, is spoken for to take away clearly all merit of our works, as being unable to deserve our justification at God's hands, and thereby most plainly to express the weakness of man, and the goodness of God, the great infirmity of ourselves, and the might and power of God, the imperfectness of our own works, and the most abundant grace of our Saviour Christ, and therefore wholly to ascribe the merit and deserving of our justification unto Christ only, and his most precious blood shedding.

It is this truth - "a most wholesome Doctrine" (Article XI) -  which animates the Church's worship, is made present in the Sacraments, and assures us on our earthly pilgrimage: it is God alone who saves us.

3. In his True and Catholic Doctrine of the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ, Cranmer quotes Saint Hilary on the gift of the Lord's Body and Blood in the holy Eucharist:

If the Word was made verily flesh, and we verily receive the Word being flesh in our Lord’s meat, how shall not Christ be thought to dwell naturally in us? Who, being born man, hath taken unto him the nature of our flesh, that cannot be severed, and hath put together the nature of his flesh to the nature of his eternity, under the sacrament of the communion of his flesh unto us ... Christ have taken verily the flesh of our body, and the man that was verily born of the Virgin Mary is Christ, and also we receive under the true mystery the flesh of his body, by means whereof we shall be one, (for the Father is in Christ, and Christ in us).

Cranmer declares that Saint Hilary's words do not imply "the natural and corporal presence" of the Lord's Body and Blood but, rather, teach the gift and truth of the sacramental presence:

And as the union between Christ and us in baptism is spiritual ... so likewise our union with Christ in his holy Supper is spiritual.

Mindful of Cranmer's insistence that Saint Hilary gives expression to the 'true and Catholic doctrine of the Sacrament', we can therefore say that Cranmerian liturgy coheres with Saint Hilary's statement that the One "verily born of the Virgin Mary" is He who "we receive under the true mystery" of the holy Eucharist.  Indeed, Cranmer himself elsewhere echoed Hilary's affirmation:

I have written in more than an hundred places, that we receive the selfsame body of Christ that was born of the Virgin Mary, that was crucified and buried, that rose again, ascended into heaven, and sitteth at the right hand of God the Father Almighty. And the contention is only in the manner and form how we receive it ... we receive Christ's own very natural body, but not naturally nor corporally.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...