Skip to main content

The Life of the World to Come: a homily for Epiphany IV

‘Then we will see face to face’: the life of the world to come

At the early Eucharist on the Fourth Sunday after the Epiphany, 2022

I Corinthians 13

“We look … for the life of the world to come.” 

Week by week we declare this in the Creed we profess at the Eucharist. It is, however, probably one of those aspects of the Christian Faith that many of us shy away from.

There has been a tendency, stretching back over the last century, for Christians to focus on those aspects of the Faith that are primarily concerned with the life of this world, not the life of the world to come. 

We want others to know, in the words of the Christian Aid slogan, that Christians ‘believe in life before death’.

But, while it is obviously important to remind ourselves of our commitment as Christians to the life of this world, we fail to say something of foundational significance if we avoid the Creed’s declaration: “We look … for the life of the world to come”.

Words from Saint Paul in our epistle reading today explain why this is so: “For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then we will see face to face. Now I know only in part; then I will know fully, even as I have been fully known”.

To confess faith in “the life of the world to come” is to say that now, in this world, our earthly lives cannot bear the fullness of meaning, truth, wisdom, love, goodness. 

So now we see only dimly, we know only in part: we do not, we cannot, in heart, mind, and soul know the fullness of meaning, truth, wisdom, love, goodness. 

But we will, for “we look … for the life of the world to come”. The fullness of meaning, truth, wisdom, love, goodness is not forever removed from us, not forever closed to us. 

For in “the life of the world to come”, we will gaze upon God; we will “see face to face”. In the life of the world to come, we will know God, even as God knows us.

Which is to say, “the life of the world to come” is the fullness of life in God. One of the greatest thinkers of the Christian tradition, Saint Augustine, put it with profound simplicity: “God … is the life everlasting”.  

The “life of the world to come” is not some abstract, natural notion of our immortality: it is dwelling in the fullness of God, seeing God face to face, knowing God as God knows us.

As we gather for this Eucharist in our side-chapel week by week, as we confess week by week in the Creed “We look … for the life of the world to come”, we see this icon of the Holy Trinity, the three Persons of the One God, open to us, with space for us to dwell, to abide, to behold. 

It is a foretaste, an anticipation of what shall be, of “the life of the world to come”. As we gaze upon the icon we see the Christian hope, that “God … is the life everlasting”, the One in whom we will dwell, in whom we will abide, whom we will behold eternally. 

“For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then we will see face to face. Now I know only in part; then I will know fully, even as I have been fully known.”

Comments

  1. Hello! I am a former Roman Catholic who has found himself between the Anglican and Lutheran traditions. I currently attend an "evangelical Catholic" Lutheran church but also have a lot of sympathies for the old High Church tradition, as they seem similar to the Lutherans. Is the Old High Church tradition still alive and well?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many thanks for your comment. I do think there are many similarities between 'high' Lutheranism and the Old High tradition - both are Reformed Catholic traditions, grounded in sacrament and liturgy. In terms of the OHC tradition, I did try to address this in another post on its continuities with the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. Its influence is certainly felt within contemporary Anglicanism in manifold ways.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...