Skip to main content

'Natural and consistent, without pretensions or affectation': Le Mesurier's Bampton Lectures and ordinary Anglican piety

In the sixth of his 1807 Bampton Lectures, On the Nature and Guilt of Schism, Le Mesurier turns to a significant aspect of Old High piety which both reflected a defining characteristic of the spirituality of Anglicanism 1662-1832 and continues to shape and influence conventional Anglican piety; the critique and rejection of an excessive asceticism. I have elsewhere described this as the Anglican 'rejection of The Weird', the refusal of a piety and spirituality dependent upon a radical separation of grace and nature, sacred and secular. 

Le Mesurier - in a manner which summarises a key thread in 18th century Anglican preaching - sees this exemplified in Our Lord:

Any man who coolly considers the workings of our holy religion, as exemplified in the conduct of our Lord and his apostles, will, I think, agree with me, that there is no quality which so peculiarly and appropriately belongs to it as sobriety. It is throughout natural and consistent, without pretensions or affectation. Our blessed Lord came down upon earth expressly to suffer. It was a part of his mission that he should be placed in an inferior rank of life, that he should be poor, "despised and rejected of men." But we never find him, voluntarily, or by any act of his, aggravating the evils and inconveniences of that situation in which he was found, imposing upon himself, or his followers, unnecessary mortifications. So far from it, we find him reproached by the hypocrites of those days, because, as he expresses it, "he came eating and drinking." So much was he in every respect like unto his brethren, sin only excepted.

When he observed that "the foxes had holes, and the birds of the air had nests, but the son of man had not where to lay his head," it was said not ostentatiously nor by way of complaint, but simply as a warning to those who were mistaking the nature of his kingdom. He was buffeted indeed and spit upon, and he patiently submitted to it ; but he did not provoke or unnecessarily expose himself to these or any other indignities. Nay, in one instance when he was struck, he remonstrated with the man who had committed that outrage.

Likewise, this same sobriety Le Mesurier sees in the apostles:

Similar to this was the conduct of the apostles, those true and faithful followers of their blessed master. In them may be traced the same moderation, the same evenness and steadiness both of life and conversation. They were equally free from rashness and from weakness. Their zeal was fervent and pure, and uniformly active, but never broke out into excess or violence of any sort. They lived with other men, and like other men; nay, at times in houses which they hired sometimes they were maintained by the disciples, at other times they provided for themselves; as was best suited to circumstances and as might best promote or advance the gospel which they preached. They fasted indeed, but only as others fasted, as was common, and as has always been common, more especially in eastern countries. If they journeyed often, if they were often in perils and dangers, it was not that they desired these things, but that they necessarily met with them in the course of their mission. As to scourgings and imprisonments, them they not only did not inflict them upon themselves, but they complained of them and would have avoided them when inflicted by others.

In some cases they actually did escape them by their own act: in others the hand of God miraculously interposed for their deliverance. Above all, their humility was real, it was natural and without parade. There was no ostentatious self- abasement, none of that disclaimer of merit which is only calculated to invite praise. They seemed never to think of themselves : yet when called upon by the occasion they readily and naturally spoke of their labours with all the simplicity of truth, without exaggeration or diminution.

It is, of course, easy to caricature this as worldly, comfortable 18th century Anglicanism, the very piety which Tractarianism reacted against, regarding its proponents as 'Two Bottle Orthodox'. This was a case of Tractarians being aligned with 18th century revivalists who likewise portrayed ordinary, conventional Anglicanism as worldly, insufficiently radical, and lacking in zeal.

Le Mesurier, however, points to the deeply scriptural basis for this conventionally Anglican rejection of radical asceticism and its implicit sectarianism. Within the Gospels, it is the spiritual elitism of the Pharisees and the practices which marked them off from the crowd which are robustly critiqued and overthrown by Jesus. The apostolic exhortation against a radical asceticism is also significant:

Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving.

Ordinary Anglican piety, with its suspicion of radical asceticism as a form of Enthusiasm, can embody this evangelical and apostolic understanding. Related to this, such ordinary Anglican piety -with its rejection of the practices and claims of spiritual elitism - might be described in a term from Gregory Dix: it is the piety of "the plebs sancta dei - the holy common people of God".

The rejection of radical asceticism described by Le Mesurier - an enduring feature of Anglican piety - therefore contributes to what John Milbank describes as the "hidden coherence" of Anglicanism:

radically biblical yet hyper-Catholic; sturdily incarnated in land, parish and work, yet sublimely aspiring in its verbal, musical and visual performances.

Rather than a lazy worldliness, the sober, modest piety of 18th century Anglicanism - with its rejection of radical asceticism, Enthusiasm, and sectarianism - provides a crucial contribution to the Anglican vocation, gathering up (not rejecting) the civic, the domestic, the national, the natural environment, the artistic, the goodness of creation in that "hidden coherence" identified by Milbank.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...