Skip to main content

'Especially contrary to the spirit of the Gospel': a Hackney Phalanx sermon and the bogeyman of High Church 'moralism'

Recent posts in the series of extracts from an 1814 collection of sermons by Christopher Wordsworth (senior, d.1846), associated with the Hackney Phalanx, have demonstrated how a lively call to vibrant faith was present in Hackney and Old High preaching. Today we return to another - and no less significant - aspect of such preaching: its vision of the moral life in Christ. 

The sermon was what Wordsworth described as "a Christian discourse and exposition of the sixth commandment", in light of the exhortation in the Sermon on the Mount "That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause, shall be in danger of the judgment":

Anger implies displeasure against our brother, along with some degree of desire to inflict pain upon him, for an injury, real or supposed, which he has done to ourselves; or to others, whose honour and interests are dear to us. Anger is wrong, according to our Saviour, where it is " without" a due "cause;" that is, where we are displeased, through our own mistake, with one who indeed has done us no injury; nay, it may be, has done us great services.

It is wrong again, where we mistake the person who has injured us. It is wrong, thirdly, when it is excessive, of undue magnitude, and disproportioned to the cause of provocation. And, why is it thus wrong in all these cases?

Doubtless, for reasons, in kind at least, the very same that murder is so. It is wrong, because it is injurious to ourselves; injurious to our brother; injurious to the common peace and happiness of the world, and so displeasing to our heavenly Father. It is wrong, too, because it is unseemly and indecorous; an angry man is a painful and disgraceful object: because it is especially contrary to the spirit of the Gospel, for that is meekness; and to the example of Jesus, for that is love: it is wrong, in fine, because it is the fruitful parent, the source and spring from which many other offences in word and deed, bitter revilings, mutual dissensions, and quarrels, and often even blood-shedding and murder, do arise.

What should be obvious, of course, is that to describe such Old High preaching as 'moralism' is nothing less than nonsense. The moral vision of the Christian life is inherent to the Scriptures of the New Testament, inherent to the Gospel. A failure by the Church's teaching ministry to set forth this moral vision, rather than being a supposedly commendable 'Gospel-centred', 'evangelical ministry, is an abject failure to proclaim the whole counsel of God, and to adhere to the Dominical and Apostolic call to be those who "hearth these sayings of mine, and doeth them".

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more