Skip to main content

Preaching to a polite and commercial people: A Hackney Phalanx sermon on the love of money

One of the most influential studies in the last few decades of Georgian England was entitled A Polite and Commercial People. While, as J.C.D. Clark famously reminded us, English society 1688-1832 remained firmly monarchical, dynastic, and aristocratic, the title does point to the economic and cultural significance of the commercial and trading concerns of the society in which the Georgian Church of England ministered. These concerns were also to the fore of the 1812-27 premiership of Lord Liverpool, as William Anthony Hay has shown in his biography. Liverpool defended "a balanced political order ... to secure ordered liberty and property ... [to] secure prosperity and rising living standards".  

Now this might seem an odd introduction to the next extract in the series from an 1814 collection of sermons by Christopher Wordsworth (senior, d.1846), associated with the Hackney Phalanx. The connection is, however, two-fold.  Firstly, the cultural and social context in which these sermons were delivered - particularly to educated Anglican laity - was one aptly summarised by the phrase 'a polite and commercial people'. Secondly, Lord Liverpool's ecclesiastical policy was profoundly influenced by his relationship with the Hackney Phalanx: as Hay notes, Liverpool strongly identified with the principles and concerns of the Hackney Phalanx.

This background makes the following extract interesting. Wordsworth roundly challenges commercial aspirations, ambitions, and desires which are not grounded in, and reformed by, a Christian moral vision. He does so, not as a lowly cleric far from the centres of influence, but as a former domestic chaplain of Archbishop of Canterbury Charles Manners-Sutton, a former chaplain to the House of Commons, who dedicated this collection of sermons to the Archbishop's son (to whom he had been tutor), then Judge Advocate General in the administration of Lord Liverpool. 

The extract, in other words, is an example of how the preaching of the Old High tradition of the Hackney Phalanx was - contrary to later, woefully inaccurate stereotypes - incapable of or unwilling to  meaningfully challenging norms and aspirations of Georgian society:

But Demas, his choice and desire was this world and like all those who seek their portions, and set up their abode here, he found, it cannot be doubted, that very world, vanity, and bitterness, and vexation of spirit; short-lived, empty, and unprofitable.

For what is it? Truly it cannot satisfy. For, "What is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul ?" Is it everlasting like Heaven? "The fashion of this world passeth away." What is your life? "It is even a vapour that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away." The rich man when he dieth, shall he carry any thing away with him? Shall his glory descend after him? "We brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out."

It was such as Demas whom St. Paul spake of, when he continued, "But they that will, be rich, fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition: For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows." Yea, the time must come, when they shall find, to their bitter woe, that such a friendship with the world has been enmity with God: that is, that whosoever will be a friend of the wicked, carnal, unbelieving, and apostate world, is the enemy of God.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...