Skip to main content

'For we too have the star in the East': Keble's Epiphany sermon and Old High piety

In his sermon Epiphany sermon 'The duty of public worship' (from Sermons for Christmas and Epiphany, 1875), we have yet another example of Keble's preaching reflecting the norms of Old High piety, with little - if any - sense of a Tractarian rupture. This is evident in his description of the spiritual formation which shaped his congregation, a formation grounded in home, catechism, parish church, Sunday worship, Scripture, and Christmas celebrations:

For we too have the star in the East: Christ's tokens have shone upon us, and that exceeding brightly. From our very babyhood, as long as we can remember, we have been told of this young Child and of Mary His Mother: our catechisms have told us of Him, we have been taught to name Him in our prayers, and to bow at that Most Holy Name: we have seen His House with the sign of His Cross upon it, far unlike all the other houses around us, and His Day far unlike all the other days of the week: we have been taken into that house, and told how to behave there, because He is there: We have been taught something of the Holy Bible, His Book, and how unlike it is to all other books: We have all our lives long been used to the sights and sounds of Christmas, the carols, and the green boughs, and all the rest. The time would fail me to tell the hundredth part of the tokens that are around us, that we have really and truly seen that star in the East, Christ present by His Church and all His visible tokens here on earth.

In terms of the particular duty of public worship, Keble likewise expounds this in a manner which also was conventionally Old High: 

This He expects of us all, to come and worship Him: not only to pray, not only to exercise ourselves inwardly in good, dutiful, religious thoughts, but to render Him homage in the sight of men and Angels: to confess with lip and knee as well as with heart, that we have none in Heaven but Him; neither is there any upon earth that we desire in comparison of Him. This is a distinct duty, and cannot be satisfied by any devotion which is only between God and ourselves. As our King, He expects that we should wait upon Him in public, and tender Him our reverent adoration in the presence of all His people, Angels and men: but this we cannot do, except we come where Angels and men are assembled around Him, their God: and where is that, but in His own Place, the Church? Thither we must resort, as the Israelites resorted to Jerusalem: willfully to stay away from Church, is to fail in dutiful acknowledgment to our great and holy King.

What of the Eucharist? There are two references to the Sacrament in this sermon:

in Holy Communion; with child-like, earnest lifting up of the heart for ourselves and for all whom we ought to remember ... And if we worship, we must give: we must give alms of our substance; and in Holy Communion we must offer to Him "ourselves, our souls and bodies."

The fact that there are but two such references is itself significant: Keble is referring to public worship in such a way that it is clear that the Eucharist is not the sole or, indeed, the most regular act of public worship. Note, too, how the Sacrament is described in quite conventional terms: 'Holy Communion'. And, perhaps above all, neither reference is suggestive in any way of a distinctive Tractarian sacramental piety.

(The picture is of Keble's parish church, All Saints, Hursley, Hampshire.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...