'The visible representation of sacred objects': An 18th century Anglican defence of venerating imagery

In the Introduction to The Ornaments of Churches Considered, With a Particular View to the Late Decoration of the Parish Church of St. Margaret Westminster (1761), Thomas Wilson - a Prebendary of Westminster - provides what we might regard as a thoroughly Laudian response to those who object that his defence of imagery will inevitably lead to a situation in which reverence will be shown to such 'visible representations':

But perhaps it may be affirmed, that some Respect will certainly be paid to the visible Representation of sacred Objects. And why, it may be asked, should it not? Surely the same Veneration is due to them, that we allow to every Thing employed in the Service of God, and more they will scarcely receive ...

Should we see then some pious Christian fixed with Attention upon a Picture of the Crucifixon, would it not be absurd and injurious to suppose, that this was an Adoration of the Objects before him, and not the Consequence of his being led into a Train of Reflexions on that stupendous Instance of his Redeemer’s Benevolence, by which he is again a Candidate for eternal Happiness?

What is more, Wilson also quoted from William Wake's Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of England (1686):

When the Pictures of ... of our Saviour and the blessed Saints be by all necessary Cautions rendered truly the Books not Snares of the Ignorant, then will we respect the Images of our Saviour and of the blessed Virgin. And as some of us now bow down towards the Altar, and all of us are enjoined to do so at the Name of the Lord Jesus; so will we not fail to testify all due Respect to his Representation.

Mindful that Wake was Archbishop of Canterbury 1716-37, and that Wilson himself was the son of a bishop and a royal chaplain, we are not talking about marginal figures with Non-juring sympathies. Wilson and Wake, by contrast, represent the doctrinal and liturgical mainstream of the 18th century Church of England. And here they provide a Laudian defence of imagery in churches and, significantly, of - to use Wilson's term - "veneration" for such imagery.

Comments

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders. With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter. The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition). Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical). Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics". Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics. What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition. Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School. Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979. We ...

laudable Practice

Search This Blog