'The Ornaments of Churches Considered': An 18th century defence of the Laudian 'beauty of holiness'

In 1758, with the parish of St. Margaret's, Westminster - the parish church of the House of Commons - requiring restoration, a stained glass window was purchased by the parish, to be installed over a new east end. This Flemish window (pictured) dated to c.1526, having been designed, at the direction of Henry VII, to mark the wedding of the then Prince Henry to Catherine of Aragon. Having purchased the window, the wardens of St. Margaret's became the centre of controversy, as objectors claimed that the design of the window - a depiction of the Crucified Lord - was 'popish', mounting a (failed) legal challenge to the plan to install the window.

This was the context in which Thomas Wilson, Prebendary of Westminster, wrote the Introduction to The Ornaments of Churches Considered, With a Particular View to the Late Decoration of the Parish Church of St. Margaret Westminster (1761). It was a thoroughly Laudian defence or ornaments and ceremony, with the "beautifying" of St. Margaret's (as stated in the dedication, to the then Speaker of the Commons) the focus for the work, particularly the "Propriety and Lawfulness" of the proposed east window.

Over coming weeks, a series of extracts from this work will be explored, demonstrating how it witnesses to a significant continuation of the Laudian 'beauty of holiness' vision in the 18th century Church of England. We begin with words from the Preface, outlining a Laudian defence of imagery in churches - in this case, a stained glass depiction of the Lord's Passion - as "general and established Custom", entirely compatible with "the Doctrine of our Church, and the Purport of our Laws".

The Colouring, the Expression, and the General Beauty of this Piece, they found, were universally admired by the most critical Judges; and from the historical Representation of our Blessed Saviour's Crucifixion contained in it, the greatest Propriety was deemed to arise for placing it over the Communion Table ...

Thus, that Painting, and particularly that which is of a sacred Kind, may not only be innoxious, but of a beneficial and edifying Nature, is agreeable to Reason and Experience, and to the general Sense of Mankind. And hence that any well chosen Piece of Scripture History, represented by Delineation and Colours, be placed or permitted to be retained in Churches, is not repugnant to any Command of Scripture, nor to any Canon or Statute of our Kingdom, but on the contrary hath been authorized by a general and established Custom.

Comments

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders. With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter. The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition). Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical). Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics". Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics. What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition. Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School. Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979. We ...

laudable Practice

Search This Blog