Skip to main content

'And it was night': endless love in the darkness

At the evening Eucharist of Maundy Thursday, 28.3.24

John 13:1-2, 30

“The devil had already put it into the heart of Judas son of Simon Iscariot to betray him.”

As Jesus and the disciples gathered for the Last Supper, the darkness was gathering. It was, already, present in that upper room - and not only in the heart of Judas.

At supper, Jesus would tell a boastful Peter, so sure of the strength of his faith, that he would, instead, betray Jesus that very night. 

Jesus tells the other disciples that they will scatter, leaving him alone, abandoned.

The writer of the Fourth Gospel powerfully captures this sense of gathering darkness in describing Judas leaving the upper room to undertake his act of betrayal:

“He immediately went out. And it was night”.

In our parish Lent book, Lent with the Beloved Disciple, Michael Marshall says, “turning his back on Jesus, the light of the world, [Judas] walked into the darkness” [1].

They all walked into the darkness: Judas, Peter, the other disciples. All alike turned from the One who is the Light, entering into the cold darkness.

“And it was night.”

The thick darkness will have willing allies in the hours to come: the religious authorities, fearful of Jesus, condemning him; the religious police, maltreating Jesus; Pilate, the worldly, cynical political operator, colluding with injustice to further his ambitions; the Roman soldiers, casually torturing an innocent man; the crowd, pitiless and unmoved by the sight of Jesus bloodied and abandoned.

“And it was night.”

But, One has entered willingly into this night, this darkness. The One of whom John’s Gospel says at its outset, “in him was life, and the life was the light of all people. The light shines in the darkness and the darkness has not overcome it”.

Jesus enters into the thick, deep darkness of a world confused and lost, cynical and cruel, broken and uncertain, unjust and unforgiving.

“And it was night.” It is the world you and I know. The world scarred by brutal conflicts and by harsh prejudices. The world in which our lives are too often overshadowed by our fears and resentments, our selfishness and pride. The world in which illness and death is a reality, with the pain and heartbreak this brings.

It is into this night, this darkness that Jesus comes, on this night in which he is betrayed and handed over unto suffering and death.

There is a famous painting by the 17th century Dutch artist Gerard van Honthorst, entitled ‘Christ before the high priest’. The scene is one of gloom and darkness. The high priest is seated at a desk, an inquisitor, sure of his authority. Christ the prisoner stands before him, being interrogated, silent, condemnation inevitable. A single candle is on the desk, casting but a little light. For this is the hour of darkness.

In the very midst of the darkness is Our Lord. And the darkness will only intensify as the hours go by and we enter into that first Good Friday. The darkness of torture, suffering, crucifixion, death … and then the final darkness, the darkness of the tomb.

The liturgy of Maundy Thursday captures something of this when, as the service ends this evening, the lights are dimmed, our parish church enters into darkness, and the altar is stripped as the choir chant Psalm 22, the psalm which Our Lord invoked upon the Cross.

The sanctuary is left dark, cold, bare - a sign of the darkness into which Christ willingly entered, for us, for all.

Our Gospel reading on this night of darkness opens with these words: “Having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end”.

What is it we encounter and behold this night and into Good Friday? What is it we encounter and behold in the upper room and in the garden, in the scenes of betrayal and denial, before the high priest and Pilate, in the Cross and the Tomb? What is it we encounter and behold in this night, this darkness?

“Having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end”.

This night, we behold Jesus Christ as the presence and revelation of divine love in the darkest times, the darkest parts of this world, of our lives. There is no time, no place, no experience so dark that Christ is not there to be found, the presence and revelation of divine love, embracing us in mercy, restoring and renewing us as daughters and sons of our Heavenly Father.

This night Our Lord enters into the deepest darkness for us and for our salvation.

Augustine, a 5th century North African bishop and one of the greatest teachers of the faith in the Christian tradition, simply but beautifully summarises the meaning of this night: it is, he says, the night in which we behold the One “who loves us always and endlessly” [2].

Whatever times and experiences of night and darkness I, you, we know, this world knows, this night - the night in which he was betrayed - is the revelation that the love of God in Christ is “always and endlessly” present with us and for us, bringing us over from darkness to light, from death to life, from the gloomy shades of night to the morning of resurrection.

----------
[1] Michael Marshall Lent with the Beloved Disciple (2024), p.66.

[2] Saint Augustine in Tractate 55 on John's Gospel.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...