Skip to main content

'Distinctness and splendour': an Old High sermon for Easter Day

From an Easter Day sermon of the 1820s, by Charles James Blomfield when he was vicar of St. Botolph-without-Bishopsgate, London and (from 1824-28) Bishop of Chichester, standing in the Old High tradition. 

In characteristic Old High fashion, Blomfield here sees our participation in the Easter embodied in prayer, scripture, and sacrament (note this pre-1833 reference to "frequent communion") and in the call to holy living. The scripture references are a reminder of how the Old High tradition robustly and confidently regarded itself as rooted in Holy Scripture. There is a deeply Pauline nature to this emphasis: like the Apostle, the Old High tradition understood the Resurrection as necessarily expressed in ecclesial communion and holy living. In the absence of such witness to and fruit of "distinctness and splendour", the Resurrection is not being confessed.

... the resurrection of our Lord, as recorded by the  Evangelists, and as explained and improved by the Apostles, has given a degree of distinctness and splendour to our prospects of the eternal world, which leaves us without excuse, if we continue to live as though we had hope in this life only. Christ is risen, and ascended into heaven; and his church no longer enjoys his bodily presence. 

But the faithful Christian, while he looks forward to his participation of that joy, with the lively hope to which he has been begotten by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead; anxiously strengthens his faith and confirms his hope, by all the aids and means vouchsafed to those who are in covenant with God; by deep meditation on the precious promises of his Word; by constant fervent prayer to the Father, through him who died and is risen again; by frequent communion at that holy table, where the Lord is to be found by the faithful until his coming again: 'whom, having not seen, we love; in whom, though now we see him not, yet believing, we rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory'. Christ was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification. We have the promise of being made like to him hereafter, if, being justified by faith in his blood, we strive, by the help of his Holy Spirit, to resemble him here. 

No argument can be more conclusive, no motive more touching than this, both to hope and to holiness; 'Beloved, now are we the sons of God; and it doth not yet appear what we shall be; but we know, that when lie shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as fie is. And every man that hath this hope in him, purifieth himself, even as he is pure'.

(The photograph is of St Botolph-without-Bishopsgate, the church in which Blomfield preached this sermon.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...