Skip to main content

'The inexhaustible fountain of grace': on the Third Collect, for Grace, at Matins

Continuing with extracts from John Shepherd's A Critical and Practical Elucidation of the Morning and Evening Prayer of the Church of England (1796), we turn to the Third Collect at Matins, for Grace. As with the Second Collect at Matins, Shepherd notes its antiquity and provenance: "The substance of this Collect was borrowed from an ancient form in the Eastern church". In other words, to pray this collect day by day at Matins is to place ourselves alongside the great Churches of the East.

Shepherd focuses on the divine titles invoked at the opening of the collect, "our heavenly Father, Almighty and everlasting God", reflecting upon these as grounding our daily prayer and reliance upon grace in the nature of God. Yet again, it is a commentary which brings us to recognise the theological richness and depths of words prayed each day.

Grace being so essential to our happiness, we address ourselves to the inexhaustible fountain of grace, to him who is more ready to give than we to ask, under the titles of our heavenly Father, Almighty and everlasting God. Our heavenly Father who pities and loves us, delights to do us good. He is Almighty and therefore able to relieve us. His mercy, and ability we have no reason to doubt, for he changes not, but is the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever. He is God from everlasting to everlasting, world without end. The care of the church in prefixing to the Collects, Attributes appropriate to the requests they contain has been already noticed. Thus, whilst she directs us, what we ought to pray for, she cheers our hearts, and enlivens our devotions; adds wings to our petitions, and gives energy to our faith.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...