Skip to main content

'Thus shall we declare that Christ's gifts and graces have their effect in us': the Old High heart at Holy Week and Easter

Amidst many Anglican posts during Holy Week and Easter on 'X' of Chrism Eucharists, foot-washings, altars of repose, and Easter Vigils, there was another current to be detected. Small in number, perhaps, but some posts on 'X' during this highpoint of the liturgical year might be regarded as suggesting that the ordinary, modest, reserved Anglican piety of the Old High tradition can continue to have resonance and appeal.

We begin with the excellent Episcopalian Reformed theologian Fleming Rutledge on Good Friday:

Good Friday is surely a day for such a stark, unfussy liturgy, not overwhelming the senses, a liturgy which stills us in heart, mind, and soul before the mystery of the Cross, proclaimed by prophets, apostles, and evangelists. Too much movement, receiving the Sacrament only hours after reception on Maundy Thursday, overwhelming (and, simultaneously, necessarily inadequate imagery): this can - for some of us - distract rather than aid, failing to still us before the word of the Cross. 

For an example of a Prayer Book Good Friday we can turn to St. Giles-in-the-Fields, London:

One person, who had attended the service, commented on 'X' that it was "the most moving service of Mattins I have ever experience". Such can be the effect of a sober, restrained service of Matins on Good Friday, setting before us the Crucified One who seeks not a kiss of the lips but the faithful obedience of heart and soul.

Then there is Easter Eve:

I have previously sought to articulate something of this. It is not to argue against those who value the Vigil and celebrate it in a packed church. It is, rather, to say that those of us who value an Easter Eve marked by Matins, Ante-Communion, and Evensong - and thus no Vigil - are not opting for a somehow inferior commemoration of the day. It is a pattern which both allows for reflection on the Lord's descent to the dead and prepares us for the celebration of Easter Day.

Easter is a time to again be grateful for the churchyard, as Fergus Butler-Gallie wonderfully explored:

The headstones and memorials in the churchyard - with their tributes and memories - are not to be dismissed as the stuff of 'natural religion' (as if natural religion were a bad thing). No, they point to the reality of death gathered up and transformed in the hope of Easter:

The power of Easter is that it absolutely – necessarily, even – embraces the reality of death, yet also refuses to grant it dominance. It doesn’t pretend that those who lie in the dark of the earth by the Padburys or the little Edens or Mr Whippy are not dead, but nor does it define them by that fact. It doesn’t deny the pain or darkness of death, but it places it in the context of hope.

Then there was Easter Monday in Halifax, Nova Scotia:

No doubt regarded as terribly 'low church' by some contemporary Anglican opinion, this was - of course - a deeply Laudian and Old High celebration: the priest duly vested in surplice and tippet, north end signifying the relationship between the commemorative sacrifice of the Eucharist and the intercession of our Great High Priest, the communicants humbly kneeling to receive, on Monday in Easter Week as provided for in the decent rite of the Prayer Book, with Cranmer's grand proper preface for Easter Day "and seven days after". And as for the Book of Homilies, it was Laudian bishops who upheld it in the face of Puritan attacks. 

The Homily for Easter Day has a quite beautiful conclusion:

Let us Christian folk keep our holy day in spiritual manner, that is, in abstaining, not from material leavened bread, but from the old leaven of sin, the leaven of maliciousness and wickedness. Let us cast from us the leaven of corrupt doctrine, that will infect our souls. Let us keep our feast the whole term of our life, with eating the bread of pureness of godly life, and truth of Christ's doctrine. Thus shall we declare that Christ's gifts and graces have their effect in us, and that we have the right belief and knowledge of his holy resurrection: where truly if we apply our faith to the virtue thereof in our life, and conform us to the example and signification meant thereby, we shall be sure to rise hereafter to everlasting glory, by the goodness and mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom with the Father and the holy Ghost be all glory, thanksgiving, and praise, in infinita seculorum secula, Amen.

It is a paragraph in which gives voice to a number of characteristics found in Old High, Prayer Book piety. The truth of the Easter proclamation is not found in ceremonies but in Word and Sacrament. The Easter faith takes root within us not in mystical experiences but in holy living amidst the ordinary duties and callings of daily life: "thus shall we declare that Christ's gifts and graces have their effect in us". And it bears fruit in the quiet hope of the life everlasting, sustaining us over "the whole term of our life". 

Holy Week and Easter are not to be a dramatic re-enactment of the unique and unrepeatable events of Cross and Resurrection; they are yearly observances which call us in heart, mind, and soul to be renewed by Word and Sacrament in communion with the One who is the first-fruits of the Resurrection. A multiplicity of ceremonies and images and actions can, for some of us, be overpowering and distracting: much better (again, for some of us) the sober, restrained approach of the Prayer Book, allowing us to focus in heart, mind, and soul on the Cross and Resurrection proclaimed in Word and Sacrament. We might hope that the current suggested in this post will continue to flow, not least in a cultural context bombarded by imagery, constant distraction, and a chasing after experiences.

Finally, one of my own posts from Easter Monday, suggestive - I hope - of the modest, decent, noble simplicity of Old High piety at Holy Week and Easter:

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

'Whether the Lutheran Churches have right Ordinations and perfect succession of Bishops': Jeremy Taylor, 'Episcopacy Asserted', and Lutheran orders

Amidst the bitter controversies over episcopacy in the Three Kingdoms during the early 1640s, controversies which had become war in Scotland in 1637 and then in England in 1642, Jeremy Taylor wrote his Laudian defence of episcopal order, The Sacred Order and Offices of Episcopacy Asserted and Maintained . He proposed in this work that the non-episcopal Reformed churches could have had episcopally-ordered clergy: Those good people might have had order from the bishops of England or the Lutheran churches, if at least they thought our churches catholic and Christian. Leaving aside the reality that, for example, French Protestants would have been placed in an invidious political position if they had done as Taylor proposed, it is the reference to "the Lutheran churches" which is significant.  To begin with, a large portion of the Lutheran churches - those in the German lands - were governed by a system of superintendency. It is almost inconceivable that Taylor was not aware of th...
Post a Comment
Read more