"The Britannick Churches": Bramhall against Baxter
Below, two extracts from Bishop Bramhall's Vindication of himself and the Episcopal Clergy, from the Presbyterian Charge of Popery, written against Richard Baxter. Taken together, they give an insight into the Laudian understanding of the character of "the Britannick Churches".
In the first, Bramhall challenges Baxter's assertion that belief in the episcopal succession was intended to to "Unchurch all or most of the Protestant Churches". Bramhall does so by pointing to the significant number of those churches of the Reformation which have retained the episcopal succession, and reminds Baxter that the churches abiding by the Genevan discipline are a minority amongst the churches of the Reformation:
First, I cannot assent to his major Proposition, That all those who make an ordinary personal uninterrupted succession of Pastors to be of the integrity of a true Church (which is the ground of of his exception) have therefore an intention, or can be justly suspected thereupon to have any intention to introduce the Pope. The Eastern, Southern, and Northern Churches are all of them for such a personal succession, and yet all of them utter enemies to the Pope. Secondly, I cannot assent to his minor Proposition, that either all or any considerable part of the Episcopal Divines in England do Unchurch either all, or the most part of the Protestant Churches. No man is hurt but by himself. They Unchurch none at all, but leave them to stand or fall to their own Master. They do not Unchurch the Swedish, Danish, Bohemian Churches, and many other Churches in Poloma, Hungaria and those parts of the World, which have an ordinary uninterrupted succession of Pastors, some by the names of Bishops, others under the name of Seniors unto this day. (I meddle not with the Socinians) They unchurch not the Lutheran Churches in Germany, who both assert Episcopacie in their Confessions, and have actual Superintendents in their practice, and would have Bishops name and thing if it were in their power. Let him not mistake himself, those Churches which he is so tender of, though they be better known to us by reason of their Vicinity, are so far from being all, or the most part of the Protestant Churches, that being all put together, they amount not to so great a proportion as the Britannick Churches alone.
In the second extract, Bramhall robustly refutes Baxter's assertion that the Laudians represented a breach with the "old Episcopal divines", emphasising continuity through a shared commitment to the Formularies:
He would perswade us that there are two sorts of Episcopal Divines in England, the old and the new. And that 'there is much more difference between the old and the new, than between the old and the Presbyterians'. O confidence whither wilt thou? what is the power of prejudice, and pride? The contrary is as clear as the light; we maintain their old Liturgy, their old Ordinal, their old Articles, their old Canons, their old Laws, Practices, and praescriptions, their old Doctrine and Discipline against them. Then tell us no more of old Episcopal Divines, and new Episcopal Divines; we are old Episcopal Divines, one and all: out of his own words I condemn him; 'The old sort of Episcopal Divines that received the publick Doctrine of the Nation, contained in the 39. Articles, Homilies, &c. I wholly acquitted from my jealousies of this compliance'. If they be old Episcopal Divines, who maintain the Doctrine of the 39. Articles and Homilies, then we are all old Episcopal Divines. In acquitting all them he acquitteth all us.
In the first, Bramhall challenges Baxter's assertion that belief in the episcopal succession was intended to to "Unchurch all or most of the Protestant Churches". Bramhall does so by pointing to the significant number of those churches of the Reformation which have retained the episcopal succession, and reminds Baxter that the churches abiding by the Genevan discipline are a minority amongst the churches of the Reformation:
First, I cannot assent to his major Proposition, That all those who make an ordinary personal uninterrupted succession of Pastors to be of the integrity of a true Church (which is the ground of of his exception) have therefore an intention, or can be justly suspected thereupon to have any intention to introduce the Pope. The Eastern, Southern, and Northern Churches are all of them for such a personal succession, and yet all of them utter enemies to the Pope. Secondly, I cannot assent to his minor Proposition, that either all or any considerable part of the Episcopal Divines in England do Unchurch either all, or the most part of the Protestant Churches. No man is hurt but by himself. They Unchurch none at all, but leave them to stand or fall to their own Master. They do not Unchurch the Swedish, Danish, Bohemian Churches, and many other Churches in Poloma, Hungaria and those parts of the World, which have an ordinary uninterrupted succession of Pastors, some by the names of Bishops, others under the name of Seniors unto this day. (I meddle not with the Socinians) They unchurch not the Lutheran Churches in Germany, who both assert Episcopacie in their Confessions, and have actual Superintendents in their practice, and would have Bishops name and thing if it were in their power. Let him not mistake himself, those Churches which he is so tender of, though they be better known to us by reason of their Vicinity, are so far from being all, or the most part of the Protestant Churches, that being all put together, they amount not to so great a proportion as the Britannick Churches alone.
In the second extract, Bramhall robustly refutes Baxter's assertion that the Laudians represented a breach with the "old Episcopal divines", emphasising continuity through a shared commitment to the Formularies:
He would perswade us that there are two sorts of Episcopal Divines in England, the old and the new. And that 'there is much more difference between the old and the new, than between the old and the Presbyterians'. O confidence whither wilt thou? what is the power of prejudice, and pride? The contrary is as clear as the light; we maintain their old Liturgy, their old Ordinal, their old Articles, their old Canons, their old Laws, Practices, and praescriptions, their old Doctrine and Discipline against them. Then tell us no more of old Episcopal Divines, and new Episcopal Divines; we are old Episcopal Divines, one and all: out of his own words I condemn him; 'The old sort of Episcopal Divines that received the publick Doctrine of the Nation, contained in the 39. Articles, Homilies, &c. I wholly acquitted from my jealousies of this compliance'. If they be old Episcopal Divines, who maintain the Doctrine of the 39. Articles and Homilies, then we are all old Episcopal Divines. In acquitting all them he acquitteth all us.
There's an idea which, oddly enough, is popular among both Anglo-Calvinists and Anglo-Catholics of the Froudean school: namely, that the Laudians or "avant-garde conformists" deliberately set out to distance themselves from the Reformed religion of the 16th century CoE. Well, Bramhall, a Laudian of impeccable credentials, and arguably the finest Anglican mind after Hooker and Field, gives the lie to that. We owe him a debt of gratitude.
ReplyDeleteIn any case, it could be argued that his understanding of the episcopate, which we might identify as "plene esse", was more exalted than the "bene esse" view of reformed English divines prior to Saravia. And, yet, he is quite clear that lacking a succession of chief pastors does not nullify the ministry and sacraments of the continental Protestant churches which could not retain bishops. They are true churches, though outwardly defective, because they lack the perfection or integrity of the Church in matters of polity.
|
Incidentally, have you listened to the interviews of Jean Louis Quantin at the Anglican Audio podcast? They're first rate.
Many thanks for your comment. I entirely agree with you, on the assessment of avant-garde conformists and of Bramhall's view of continental Protestant churches. It is very clear that the avant-garde conformists are Protestant, and that they hold a 'high' Reformed view of the sacraments.
DeleteBramhall's emphasis on the fact that significant Lutheran and Reformed churches on the continent had retained the episcopate is vitally important, a reminder that 'Reformed' was a contested category and should not be defined solely in terms of Geneva.
Thanks for the tip regarding the Anglican Audio podcast - something I will definitely explore!
Brian.
This series of letters between Lancelot Andewes and the French Reformed divine, Peter Du Moulin, provide a good backdrop for understanding the high church position of the divine right of bishops as an apostolical institution which concerns the agenda, but not the credenda of the faith once delivered. Upon this distinction, Andrewes assures Du Moulin that his, and all other non-episcopal Reformed churches, are true churches.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.anglican.net/works/lancelot-andrewes-of-episcopacy-three-epistles-of-peter-moulin-answered-1647/
Many thanks indeed for this link. An excellent reminder of how Andrewes and the avant-garde conformists were not 17th century Anglo-Catholics!
DeleteBrian.
Rusticated Classicist, many thanks for the question. I actually don't think this is what he means by "Southern church". Judging by the context of his reference to the churches of the Reformation on the continent, I think he means by "Southern" the most southerly of these churches - which would be the lands of Hungary and Romania.
ReplyDeleteBrian.