Skip to main content

A Laudian account of the Articles of Religion

From the Laudian divine Peter Heylyn's Ecclesia restaurata, or, the History of the Reformation of the Church of England (1660), a description of the purpose of the Articles of Religion.  The fact that Heylyn was a robustly anti-Calvinist polemicist makes this description all the more significant in setting the Articles of Religion within the context of the confessions of the "other Protestant and Reformed Churches" and in recognising them as expressing the unity of Edward VI's Reformation and the Elizabethan Settlement.

The Lutherans having published that famous Confession of their faith, which takes name from Ausbrge, at which City it was tendered to the consideration of Charls the 5th. and the Estates of the Empire there assembled, Anno 1530. In tract of time, all other Protestant and Reformed Churches followed that example; And this they did, partly to have a constant Rule amongst themselves, by which all private persons were to frame their judgments, and partly to declare that consent and harmony which was betwixt them and the rest of those National Churches, which had made an open separation from the Popes of Rome. Upon which grounds, the Prelates of the Church of England having concurred with the godly desires of King Edward the sixth, for framing one uniform Order to be used in God's publick Worship; and publishing certain pious and profitable Sermons in the English Toung for the instruction of the people, found a necessity of holding forth some publick Rule, to testifie as well their Orthodoxie in some points of Doctrine, as their abhorrency from the corruptions of the Church of Rome, and the extravagancies of the Anabaptists and other Sectaries. This gave the first occasion to the Articles of Religion published in the Reign of King Edward the sixth, Anno 1552. as also of the Review thereof by the Bishops and Clergy assembled in their Convocation under Queen Elizabeth, Anno 1562. which being compared with one another will appear most plainly, neither to be altogether the same, nor yet much different, the later being rather an explication of the former, where the former seemed to be obscure, or not expressed in such full and significant terms as they after were, than differing from them in such points, wherein they dissented from the Romanists and some modern Hereticks.

Comments

  1. The Rusticated Classicist2 April 2020 at 12:45

    I’ve never read Heylyn but will have to seek out a volume for my bedside. The prose style is almost worthy of Isaak Walton!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. laudable Practice3 April 2020 at 20:32

      Heylyn is certainly worth reading and, yes, has an attractive prose style. He gives a real insight into the Laudian mind.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more