Skip to main content

Old High Church praise for BCP 1789

Following on from yesterday's post, the 1790 An Apology for the Liturgy and Clergy of the Church of England (attributed to Horsley) also praised PECUSA's BCP 1789 - a revision heavily influenced by what are normally regarded as Latitudinarian concerns - for being 'in all material points' the same as 1662. This is particularly significant in light of the 1789 omitting both the Athanasian Creed and the special absolution in the Visitation of the Sick, revising the introduction to the Solemnization of Marriage, allowing the signing with the Cross in Baptism to be optional, and permitting the clause in the Apostles' Creed regarding the descent into hell to be changed to omitted or replaced by 'the place of departed spirits', and offering an alternative preface for Trinity Sunday.  

These changes, while strongly condemned by the late Peter Toon, did not prevent the High Church author of An Apology from regarding the 1789 as sharing the same faith as that of 1662. This contributes, contra Toon, to a wider understanding of the Latitudinarian sensibility, not as incipient heterodoxy but a conventional expression of the piety and doctrine of (to use a phrase from An Apology shared by Old High and Latitudinarian discourse) the 'sober believer' in the communion of the ecclesia Anglicana.  It also provides a more realistic and historically grounded assessment of PECUSA's BCP 1789, the Prayer Book which sustained and contributed to the flourishing of Episcopalianism in the American Republic throughout the 19th century.

... if a more direct proof be required of the high esteem in which our form of public worship is held by learned and pious persons of the present generation, the Episcopalian Church in the United States of America will furnish one, the most illustrious and decisive: the Book of Common Prayer, which has lately been adopted by them, being in all material points the same with ours, and indeed, excepting a few alterations, not one of them impugning any article of faith, an exact copy of our own Ritual.  Such is the simple force of truth! and of such little effect have been the angry declamations of the enemies of our Ecclesiastical Constitution, and their ignorant censures of its doctrines and worship, both at home and abroad!
Labels:

Comments

  1. Josh Fink9 March 2021 at 14:56

    Hi, feel free to delete this comment, I just wanted to ask if you could recommend a list of Old High Church commentators on the 39A and the BCP. There is a long tradition of Anglican divines doing theology after the restoration by doing commentary on the formularies, but it's a big field and the old high church representatives seem more obscure--at least compared to infamous things like Tract 90.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. laudable Practice12 March 2021 at 15:50

      Hi Josh, yes you are entirely right about that long tradition - and high church representatives were very much part of it. Over the next few weeks I will put up a post with some suggestions. Hope that helps.

      Brian.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more