Skip to main content

"Not in addition to the one great sacrifice": A Hackney Phalanx sermon on the Sacrament, Good Friday, and Easter Day

From A Course of Sermons, for the Lord's Day throughout the Year, Volume I (1817) by Joseph Holden Pott - associated with the Hackney Phalanx - an extract from a sermon for Good Friday.  Here Pott appears to make reference to the custom of not celebrating the holy Sacrament on Good Friday, regarding this as a means of emphasising the commemoration of the Lord's sacrifice, for "our humble sacrifices of praise" (a reference to the Prayer of Oblation) are "not in addition to the one great sacrifice". And thus we offer eucharistic praise and thanksgivings -  "our bounden and perpetual duty" (again, echoing the Prayer Book Holy Communion) -  on Easter Day, amidst "the joy and triumph of our Redeemer's resurrection":

In a word, the whole history of our Redeemer's passion, this day recited in our ears, sets forth, at how great a price that violation of the sacred law and righteous government of God, and that fatal injury done to the noblest work of his creation, were to be repaired. It calls upon us with a voice, to which the dullest ear can scarcely be insensible, to acknowledge, with a deep humiliation, and embrace, with humble gratitude, the benefit so freely tendered, and procured for us at so vast a cost ... 

Happy is it for us, that the remembrance of our Lord's precious death, though it strike the soul with some sad thoughts, is coupled with a secret sense of joy and consolation. Our sadness cannot resemble that of the first desolate attendants on the cross of Christ. God hath spared us the drinking of that cup. The Christian cup, then, is the cup of gratitude and praise: yet before we touch it we must call to mind the depth, and consider the anguish of those wounds, by which it was replenished. Our thankfulness will then be full. We shall offer up our humble sacrifices of praise, not in addition to the one great sacrifice, which is alone sufficient to its ends and purposes, but as our bounden and perpetual duty. 

Such are the peculiar themes of this day's celebration; the main grounds, first of our humiliation, and then, of our sure comfort and rejoicing. The dawn follows the darkness: but we must first climb the barren top of Calvary, and stoop to look into the shadows of the sepulchre, before we can hope to witness, with fit dispositions, and due gratitude, the joy and triumph of our Redeemer's resurrection. 

Above all, let us remember, that the chief lesson which we have to gather, when the memory of our Redeemer's sufferings are set before us with a special celebration, consists in that conviction which we ought to entertain of the heinous quality of sin, which made so precious an atonement needful, in order that God might be just, and yet that he might justify the sinful, through the blood of Christ.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...
4 comments
Read more