The peace of Easter: a homily for Low Sunday

The peace of Easter

At early Communion on Low Sunday, 2022

John 20:19-31

“Jesus came and stood among them and said, ‘Peace be with you’ … Jesus said to them again, ‘Peace be with you’ ... [And a third time] Jesus came and stood among them and said, ‘Peace be with you’."

At one level, 'Peace be with you' was an ordinary, everyday Hebrew greeting: wishing another flourishing and well-being.

The circumstances, however, give these words of the Risen Jesus deeper meaning. The circumstances mean that these words are much more than a pleasant formality.

They speak of what the Resurrection means; of what Easter means.

The words have deep roots in the Scriptures of Israel. When the Prophet Isaiah glimpses the time of the Messiah, he describes him as “Prince of Peace”; he speaks of the Messiah’s reign inaugurating the time of peace, when swords are beaten into ploughshares, the wolf living with the lamb.

Jesus, on the night of his betrayal, had drawn on this when he said to the disciples, “Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you”. Even as betrayal and death loomed, even as the disciples were to abandon him and flee, Jesus speaks to them of the peace rooted in the very life of God, greater than the darkness of that night.

And now, after the Cross and the Resurrection, Jesus’ words reveal the meaning of his dying and rising again: “Jesus came and stood among them and said, ‘Peace be with you’ … Jesus said to them again, ‘Peace be with you’.”

Here is the fullness of God’s peace, as the Risen Jesus shows to the disciples his wounds.

We see here the signs of Cross and Empty Tomb.

The Cross: the sign of grace, love, and forgiveness, even in the midst of the bitterness of the deepest human sin and failure.

The Empty Tomb: the sign of the fullness of life, of life abundant in God, of the life flowing from God in Christ, which death cannot overcome.

Cross and Empty Tomb: here are the signs of the peace of God.

When the Apostle Paul speaks of the Cross and Resurrection, he says Christ “is our peace”.

He says that through the Cross and Resurrection we “have peace with God”.

This is the peace of God in Christ which holds us at all times, which abides, which enfolds us - in our failures and uncertainties, our weaknesses and frailties, in our life and in our death.

This, then, is not the shallow peace of a heady optimism which cannot survive failure or setback; not the temporary, passing peace which can be briefly felt by fleeing from challenging circumstances; not the empty peace which comes from closing our eyes, gritting our teeth, and telling ourselves that all is fine.

This is the peace of God bestowed in the Cross and Resurrection of Jesus, the deep peace of God not engineered by us within ourselves, but the gift of God, given to us in heart, mind, and soul.

The deep peace of God in Christ holding, sustaining, keeping us all our days, in all our circumstances.

It is the peace of Easter; the peace of the Cross and Resurrection, the peace in which we dwell as we pray, as we read the Scriptures, and as we draw near with faith and take this holy Sacrament to our comfort.

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders. With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter. The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition). Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical). Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics". Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics. What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition. Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School. Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979. We ...

laudable Practice

Search This Blog