Skip to main content

The peace of Easter: a homily for Low Sunday

The peace of Easter

At early Communion on Low Sunday, 2022 

John 20:19-31

“Jesus came and stood among them and said, ‘Peace be with you’ … Jesus said to them again, ‘Peace be with you’ ... [And a third time] Jesus came and stood among them and said, ‘Peace be with you’."

At one level, 'Peace be with you' was an ordinary, everyday Hebrew greeting: wishing another flourishing and well-being.

The circumstances, however, give these words of the Risen Jesus deeper meaning. The circumstances mean that these words are much more than a pleasant formality.

They speak of what the Resurrection means; of what Easter means.

The words have deep roots in the Scriptures of Israel.  When the Prophet Isaiah glimpses the time of the Messiah, he describes him as “Prince of Peace”; he speaks of the Messiah’s reign inaugurating the time of peace, when swords are beaten into ploughshares, the wolf living with the lamb.

Jesus, on the night of his betrayal, had drawn on this when he said to the disciples, “Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you”. Even as betrayal and death loomed, even as the disciples were to abandon him and flee, Jesus speaks to them of the peace rooted in the very life of God, greater than the darkness of that night.

And now, after the Cross and the Resurrection, Jesus’ words reveal the meaning of his dying and rising again: “Jesus came and stood among them and said, ‘Peace be with you’ … Jesus said to them again, ‘Peace be with you’.”

Here is the fullness of God’s peace, as the Risen Jesus shows to the disciples his wounds.  

We see here the signs of Cross and Empty Tomb.

The Cross: the sign of grace, love, and forgiveness, even in the midst of the bitterness of the deepest human sin and failure.  

The Empty Tomb: the sign of the fullness of life, of life abundant in God, of the life flowing from God in Christ, which death cannot overcome.

Cross and Empty Tomb: here are the signs of the peace of God.

When the Apostle Paul speaks of the Cross and Resurrection, he says Christ “is our peace”. 

He says that through the Cross and Resurrection we “have peace with God”. 

This is the peace of God in Christ which holds us at all times, which abides, which enfolds us - in our failures and uncertainties, our weaknesses and frailties, in our life and in our death.

This, then, is not the shallow peace of a heady optimism which cannot survive failure or setback; not the temporary, passing peace which can be briefly felt by fleeing from challenging circumstances; not the empty peace which comes from closing our eyes, gritting our teeth, and telling ourselves that all is fine.

This is the peace of God bestowed in the Cross and Resurrection of Jesus, the deep peace of God not engineered by us within ourselves, but the gift of God, given to us in heart, mind, and soul.  

The deep peace of God in Christ holding, sustaining, keeping us all our days, in all our circumstances.  

It is the peace of Easter; the peace of the Cross and Resurrection, the peace in which we dwell as we pray, as we read the Scriptures, and as we draw near with faith and take this holy Sacrament to our comfort.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

'Whether the Lutheran Churches have right Ordinations and perfect succession of Bishops': Jeremy Taylor, 'Episcopacy Asserted', and Lutheran orders

Amidst the bitter controversies over episcopacy in the Three Kingdoms during the early 1640s, controversies which had become war in Scotland in 1637 and then in England in 1642, Jeremy Taylor wrote his Laudian defence of episcopal order, The Sacred Order and Offices of Episcopacy Asserted and Maintained . He proposed in this work that the non-episcopal Reformed churches could have had episcopally-ordered clergy: Those good people might have had order from the bishops of England or the Lutheran churches, if at least they thought our churches catholic and Christian. Leaving aside the reality that, for example, French Protestants would have been placed in an invidious political position if they had done as Taylor proposed, it is the reference to "the Lutheran churches" which is significant.  To begin with, a large portion of the Lutheran churches - those in the German lands - were governed by a system of superintendency. It is almost inconceivable that Taylor was not aware of th...