Skip to main content

"We honour Calvin for his excellent parts": Bramhall on Calvin and the discipline of Geneva

Following on from last week's post on Bramhall and the non-episcopal continental Churches, an important passage in which Bramhall describes the absence of the episcopacy in Calvin's Geneva as "out of necessity":

No more did Calvin himself out of judgment, but out of necessity, to comply with the present estate of Geneva, after the expulsion of their Bishop: as might be made appear, it were needful, by his public profession of their readiness to receive such Bishops as the primitive Bishops were, or otherwise that they were to be reputed "nullo non anathemate dignid"; by his subscription to the Augustan Confession, which is for Episcopacy ... by his confession to the King of Polonia - "The ancient Church instituted Patriarchates, and assigned primacy to single provinces, that Bishops might be better knit together in the bond of Unity"; by his description of the charge of a Bishop that should join himself to the reformed Church, "to do his endeavour, that all the Churches within his Bishopric be purged from errors and idolatry, to go before the Curates" (or Pastors) "of his diocese by his example, and to induce them to admit the Reformation"; and, lastly, by his letters to Archbishop Cranmer, the Bishop of London, and a Bishop of Polonia.

In other words, this places Calvin's Geneva amongst those churches Bramhall describes as driven by "invincible necessity" to abandon the episcopate. Thus, Bramhall's was refusing to 'unchurch' the Church of Geneva for, to use his words from last week's post, "Should I condemn ... these as schismatics for want of Episcopacy, who want it out of invincible necessity?".

The above extract also places Calvin with those Bramhall recognises as those who honour and approve of episcopacy and, thus, free of the condemnation of those who rejected episcopacy as inherently 'papist'.

And all this, remember, from a leading Laudian: an important rejoinder to those who persist in portraying Laudianism as 'unchurching' non-episcopal Churches on the continent and as straightforwardly rejecting Calvin. Not only was the Laudian relationship with the non-episcopal Churches much more Hookerian than often supposed (as last week's post indicated), the Laudian appreciation of Calvin also stood in continuity with Hooker's measured combination of praise and critique: praising Calvin's Institutes and commentaries on Scripture, while also robustly critiquing and refuting his claims of divine right for the Genevan discipline (LEP, Preface 2.7-2.8).

It was, then, in true Hookerian fashion that Bramhall regarded Calvin:

We honour Calvin for his excellent parts, but we do not pin our religion either in doctrine or discipline or liturgy to Calvin's sleeve.

---

From The Works of The Most Reverend Father in God, John Bramhall, Volume II.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more