Skip to main content

"Complete and faithful Scriptural preaching": Jelf's Bampton Lectures on the ministry of preaching

In the fifth of his 1844 Bampton Lectures, An inquiry into the means of grace, their mutual connection, and combined use, with especial reference to the Church of England, Jelf - one of those whom Nockles lists as the 'Zs', the post-1833 continuation of the Old High tradition - concludes his reflection on the ministry of the Word as a means of grace by reflecting on the duty of preaching, particularly challenging evangelical preaching which failed to unfold the fullness of the Christian revelation.  He ends this section by - in a classically Hookerian, Laudian, and Old High manner - placing preaching within the context of "the entire service", that is, not exalting it above other ordinances:

If this be a true account of the work of an evangelist, that, surely, cannot be complete, and faithful, and Scriptural preaching, which measuring its scope by the narrow views or bigoted exclusiveness of the preacher or his flock, studiously sets forth a part only of the message, and either from inexcusable ignorance or from presumptuous self-trust, hides other no less necessary portions of God's truth. And those are liable to this charge, who either preach of morality independent of Christian truth, or of works of merit, or of faith without works, or of unconditional mercy, or of grace without means, or of Christianity without the Christian Church, or of the ministerial office without the Apostolical commission, or of regeneration without baptism, or of the Lord's Supper without a true spiritual participation amongst the faithful receivers of the body and blood of Christ; in a word, whoever preaches on any of these subjects to the actual or virtual exclusion of others. These are all instances of the partial delivery of truth, and they originate, if not in a wilful wresting of the Scripture, at least in its imperfect and unfaithful use, in the text without the context, in the letter without the spirit, in the particular view uncorrected and unbalanced by the general scope of the whole ...

He looks upon the entire service in all its details as setting forth the glory of God in Christ; and to declare His glory is to preach His Word. He will shew no undue regard for one part of his ministrations, or for an other; he will himself consider, and teach his flock to consider, the worship and the Word of God as different applications of the same principle, diversified operations wrought in us by the same one Spirit; the prayers, as faith embodied and quickened in utterance; the Lord's Prayer itself, as an epitome of the holy Volume; the Lessons, as faith taught by God; the Sermon, as faith explained and enforced by man; Holy Baptism, as signifying to us our profession; and (to pursue the thought of St. Augustine) the Holy Eucharist itself, as a sermon shewing the Lord's death and passion till He come.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more