The Prayer Book in German: Anglicans and Lutherans in 18th century North America
The Dissenters conforming to the liturgy, and the Lutherans, without exception, declaring to be members of our church.
It is the reference to the Lutherans that is particularly interesting because it continues a pattern that was seen in the American colonies before the rebellion. For example, SPG and the Bishop of London helped to support Swedish churches in Delaware, including employing missionaries in Swedish orders to minister to these communities.
As one study notes, SPG's requirement that its missionaries be in Anglican orders, had an exception:
SPG waived this requisite for Swedish missionaries because the Swedish Lutheran Church, which had retained an episcopal form, was considered to have a special relationship to the Church of England ... The Society applied this policy consistently throughout the decades before the American Revolution.
Where Lutheran clergy were not available, Anglican clergy - particularly SPG missionaries - routinely ministered to Swedish and German communities. Anglican and Lutheran clergy could also be found working together, ministering to the same Swedish communities. The study also references SPG sending Prayer Books in German when requested to do so by the clergy ministering to those communities.
The participation of Lutherans in Doty's newly-founded Anglican church in Sorel, therefore, was a continuation of a well-established relationship. Nor did it stop there. When Brunswickers, who had fought for the Crown in the American War, also settled in Sorel, "Mr. Doty requested the Society to provide some German Prayer Books ... The German Prayer Books were subsequently received and followed faithfully by the Lutherans". Here was a further expression of the close relationship between Anglicans and Lutherans maintained in the colonies before the War.
What is the significance of this relationship between Anglicans - not least the High Church SPG - and Lutherans in the American colonies and then in Canada? To begin with, it reflects the long-standing aspirations seen in Laud's hopes for a Union of the Churches of the Northern Kingdom, post-1662 emphasis on Anglican similarities with Lutheranism, and early 18th century Anglican accounts of Lutheranism (continued, of course, with the Hanoverian succession). What is more, such relationships continued well into the 19th century with, for example, the Bishop of London officially requesting the Bishop of Gothenburg in 1837 to confirm the children of English residents of that city. In other words, when the Lutherans in Sorel declared themselves to be members of the Church of England, and when Doty ministered to them without any hesitation or qualification, this was no frontier experiment but the expression of a deep and enduring Anglican-Lutheran understanding - a deep and enduring understanding which has now found expression in the Porvoo Communion.
It also contrasts, of course, with later Anglo-Catholic prejudices, already indicated by the Tractarian opposition to the Jerusalem Bishopric proposal (an initiative which was, as Nockles states, "in the best traditions of Laudianism"). When, for example, the then thoroughly Anglo-Catholic Church Times in 1920 responded to the participation of English bishops in the consecration of a Swedish bishop by declaring that beneath the ceremonial of the Church of Sweden lay "the narrowest type of Lutheran Protestantism", it is easy to imagine how utterly confused the earlier SPG missionaries in American colonies would have been. It was precisely because the Church of England and the Church of Sweden were Protestant episcopal churches that such a close relationship existed in the 18th century and beyond. The Anglo-Catholic rejection of this historic relationship was the result of the Tractarian invention of an ahistorical view that Anglicanism was not Protestant.
Finally, and rather more speculatively, the experience in the American colonies might also assist in explaining the strange tale of the proposal by John Adams that the Church of Denmark consecrate bishops for Protestant Episcopalians in the newly-independent United States of America. It does not seem so odd when we consider the close relationship between the Church of England and Lutherans in the former colonies.
(The drawing is the Lutheran church in Germantown, Pennsylvania, built in 1750. Prior to this, the Lutheran congregation worshipped in a local Anglican church.)
Many thanks for this piece!
ReplyDeleteYou may be interested to know that at least in Finland nowadays, it is possible to have dual membership in the Anglican Church in Finland, a part of the CoE Diocese in Europe, and the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland – and that this is the only exception allowed by the latter. A few individuals, including yours truly, have also utilised this option.
I am drawn particularly to the Old High Church tradition of the Church of England for several reasons, and one of them is that this strand of Anglican churchmanship seems to be the one where the most common ground with Lutheranism is to be found. With some charity in interpretation, I don’t think there are actual theological conflicts at all, rather just differences in emphases and traditions. I understand you are more of a historian, but I would be much obliged if you were to explore Anglican–Lutheran ecumenism from a theological perspective in later pieces.
Antti, many thanks for your comment. I am guessing that the dual membership of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland and the Church of England is a result of the Porvoo Communion: is that correct?
DeleteIt is fascinating that you should see an affinity between Lutheranism and the Old High tradition. This was certainly the view of quite a few significant Old High figures e.g. https://laudablepractice.blogspot.com/2020/09/as-laid-down-in-confession-of-faith-of.html.
You are right that I am much more of a historian than a theologian, but I have sought now and again to explore this issue from a theological perspective e.g. https://laudablepractice.blogspot.com/2022/02/christ-himself-jewel-and-anglican.html.
Again, many thanks for your comment.
Brian.
Thank you for your reply, Brian.
DeleteCorrect, the possibility of dual membership is a result of the Porvoo Communion. However, it is not possible to have other kinds of dual membership, with the other church being e.g. another Lutheran church. Clearly the idea must be that the Church of England is similar enough, and yet, at the same time, different enough for dual membership to be reasonable. Intriguing, no?
In fact, I am not yet sure if it is theologically tenable in the long run, once I am clear on all the implications. The main reasons for my application were not very theological at all – I was, and am, very fond of the Book of Common Prayer; I was, and am, drawn to Anglicanism's disposition towards building bridges rather than burning them; I wanted to show solidarity towards fellow magisterial, episcopal Protestants, my brothers and sisters in evangelical faith; and I happen to think that in many practical matters such as public prayer, liturgical music, and observance of the church year, we Lutherans (I do still consider myself primarily Lutheran) have important lessons to learn from Anglicans.
Actually the Porvoo Agreement already includes a clause saying that the signatory churches agree to treat members of all other signatory churches "as their own", so in a purely juridical or administrative sense, the leap to dual membership is very small. There are no actual requirements, it is just a matter of submitting a formal application. (It is interesting, by the way, that episcopal confirmation is not required either, even though confirmation in the ELCF is usually non-episcopal, done by a regular pastor.) A pastor of the Anglican Church in Finland must be involved in the process, however, so one must at least be able to explain why exactly one desires dual membership.
To conclude, thank you for the links you provided. I wrote a long two-part comment on the latter article, on eucharistic theology. Looking forward to your reply there.
Antti