Skip to main content

"Without precept, and without necessity, or even probable advantage": a Hackney Phalanx sermon for the Seventeenth Sunday after Trinity

From A Course of Sermons, for the Lord's Day throughout the Year, Volume II (1817) by Joseph Holden Pott - associated with the Hackney Phalanx - an extract from a sermon for the Seventeenth Sunday after Trinity.  Preaching on Ezekiel 14:14 - "Though these three men, Noah, Daniel, and Job, were in it, they should deliver but their own souls by their righteousness, saith the Lord" - Pott contrasted seeking out "the prudent care, the pious prayers, and charitable offices of others" with invocation of the saints.  Mindful that within a few decades the successors to the Tractarians would be recommending this practice, Pott's sermon is a reminder of the Protestant character of the Old High tradition:

We cannot avoid remarking in this place, since man has been so weak as to flee to other intercessors, even saints and angels, with that kind of trust and confidence, which is due only to one righteous Advocate; that there is a clear difference between the intercession, which men may make for one another in the day of trial, or of danger, grounded on the one main intercession of Christ Jesus, and the fond conceit of intercession to be made by departed saints, for any who shall choose them for their advocates, and confide in any manner in their merits. 

During this scene of our common warfare, and in the joint course of our Christian fellowship and duty, each man is bound to help his brother in all ways possible, and therefore in the way of prayer, which is one effectual mode of succour: but if we extend this to another life, if we seek for succour from departed saints, we must ground our application upon several dangerous and uncertain notions. Thus, if we venture to address those who are removed from this scene of their faithful service; and if we desire their prayers and intercessions at the throne of grace, we must imagine also, that they are able to receive such supplications, and that they have the necessary knowledge of our wants, both which are unwarrantable, and most dangerous conceits. It is the property of God alone, to be present everywhere, to receive the prayers, and to look upon the exigencies of his creatures. 

To him only it belongs to have the universal oversight, without hound or limit. Many nice distinctions have been invented by those, who set themselves to defend that misapplication of the voice of prayer, by which it is diverted from one only Intercessor, and commended to the patronage of others: but if those subtleties come to be forgotten for a moment, he who calls upon saints and angels, gives away to them a portion of God's incommunicable glory: he does this without warrant, and against the strict cautions of the word of God: without precept, and without necessity, or even probable advantage; for there is one sufficient Intercessor, Christ the righteous, set forth for our needs.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more