Skip to main content

"That discharge of duty": A Hackney Phalanx sermon for the Nineteenth Sunday after Trinity

From A Course of Sermons, for the Lord's Day throughout the Year, Volume II (1817) by Joseph Holden Pott - associated with the Hackney Phalanx - an extract from a sermon for the Nineteenth Sunday after Trinity. Preaching on Psalm 17:16, Pott expounds a key aspect of Old High teaching: that the Christian is truly called to live and grow in the moral life, without this being confused with the perfect righteousness of Christ imputed by justification. The moral life is the "duty" bestowed upon us through the covenant of grace, which we enter into through Baptism.

The extract also exemplifies another significant aspect of Old High piety: that the moral life in Christ is not one of "gloomy superstition" or excessive asceticism, not requiring us to deny our ordinary obligations and responsibilities. In other words, growth in the moral life occurs within, not apart from, our ordinary vocations and responsibilities.

Certain it is then, that without overweening thoughts, or high conceits, without restraints, which will maim and cripple human efforts in any just pursuit, or reasonable expectation; without departing from our ordinary occupations in the world, or renouncing the relative engagements, and best interests, of our present state; without extravagant and restless zeal, or timorous and gloomy superstition; there may be just tokens of resemblance, by which the faithful heart may recover, in some due degree, the first image of integrity, with which it was endowed. Certain it is, that this must be endeavoured and effected here, in some real measures of improvement and proficiency, in order to its future and more perfect restitution.

Observe well, that in urging the necessity of such improvements in the state of man, as shall mend and exalt the heart, and form the manners, and govern and direct the life, I speak not of that only perfect righteousness, which alone is accepted before God , as the ground of our acquittal in his sight, when the scales of judgment shall be poised, and which establishes the right to the future privileges of his heritage, and his eternal recompense. To that perfect plea, the rescued servant can contribute nothing. I speak not of that only full and effectual mediation, which is established in the sufferings and merits of that righteous head, from whom we receive the blessings and advantages, the hopes and privileges, of the covenant of grace. I speak but of that discharge of duty, and those measures of improvement, which the same Lord requires of those, who shall be owned by him , and admitted to partake in that glory, which is his by right of conquest and attainment, and which is so significantly and so truly called, his joy and his inheritance. 

I speak but of those stipulated terms, to which we stand pledged, by our first vows and undertaking; and for the due discharge of which, we receive the grants of grace, and the succours of the Holy Spirit, in this day of our appointed trial. I speak but of that service, which, when wrought, will be many ways defective in the best proficient, and which is not wrought, as the great work of our redemption was, for the purpose of procuring favour and acceptance before God, by its own worth. In that sense, let it ever be remembered, that Christ's only perfect work admits no fellowship, and that in his sufferings he had no partner. So truly was it said, that "of the people, there was none to help". I speak but of that which we are required to imitate with our best pains and unremitted care; of that similitude which we must cultivate and cherish, as the best improvement of our reasonable nature, and the end of all religious knowledge and instruction, so far as they respect the rule of life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

'Whether the Lutheran Churches have right Ordinations and perfect succession of Bishops': Jeremy Taylor, 'Episcopacy Asserted', and Lutheran orders

Amidst the bitter controversies over episcopacy in the Three Kingdoms during the early 1640s, controversies which had become war in Scotland in 1637 and then in England in 1642, Jeremy Taylor wrote his Laudian defence of episcopal order, The Sacred Order and Offices of Episcopacy Asserted and Maintained . He proposed in this work that the non-episcopal Reformed churches could have had episcopally-ordered clergy: Those good people might have had order from the bishops of England or the Lutheran churches, if at least they thought our churches catholic and Christian. Leaving aside the reality that, for example, French Protestants would have been placed in an invidious political position if they had done as Taylor proposed, it is the reference to "the Lutheran churches" which is significant.  To begin with, a large portion of the Lutheran churches - those in the German lands - were governed by a system of superintendency. It is almost inconceivable that Taylor was not aware of th...