Skip to main content

As the leaves fall: Remembrance Sunday in the parish church

As the leaves fall, as the mid-November days grow shorter and colder, we observe Remembrance Sunday.

The season is befitting for the observance.  There is nothing brash, loud, or glorious about late Autumn: it has an air of melancholy, of gentle decline. Intimations of mortality surround us.

We will gather in the parish church, wearing our poppies. If one was seeking a symbol of nationalistic fervour, the poppy would - to say the least - be a very odd choice.  A delicate little flower, bearing no national colours. A delicate little flower which grew in foreign fields, fields which saw loss and sacrifice, not shock and awe triumphs.

Names will be read out at the parish war memorial. 

Sons of the parish, and one daughter, killed in the Great War and the Second World War. We still recognise some of the surnames. Whether we recognise the names or not, these are are sons and a daughter of our parish. Some will have been baptised at our font and received the holy Sacrament at our altar rails. 

They had family who sat in our pews, praying for their safe return; mourning in those same pews after the telegram arrived, informing parents, spouses, and siblings that their loved one had fallen in Flanders field, in the waters of the Atlantic, or in the skies over Europe. 

We look around at the dedications in stained glass windows in our parish church. Of 6 windows in the nave, 5 commemorate young men of our parish who fell in the Great War. This was a parish deeply marked by the loss and sacrifice of that war.

After the names are read out, the solemn silence. 

Solemn silence, as the leaves fall, as the mid-November days grow shorter and colder

Silence which stills us in the face of such loss and sacrifice; silence drawing us into prayer.

For we commend those whom we have named, those of our parish, to the God who is Creator and Redeemer.

There are no words about the glories of war. No nationalistic calls. No bombastic proclamations.

Names. Silence. Prayer.

Then there is the National Anthem.  We last sung it in the parish at the King's Accession. Its sparse use in divine service means that it marks national solemnity, a time to particularly seek God's blessing on our common life.

It is a moment which can move us to be thankful that the anthem of this realm is no stirring call to arms, no urging on of duty to patria, no invocation of a mythical volk

It is simply a prayer for the King, a prayer for the good, peaceable, and just government of the realm.

And we might briefly glimpse as we sing the National Anthem, that it was for this that those names we have just heard fought and died: for a quiet, peaceable, just realm, the "quiet and peaceable life" for which the Apostle exhorts we pray.

Our service on Remembrance Sunday ends with the now traditional blessing:

God grant to the living grace, to the departed rest, to the Church, the King, the Commonwealth and all people, unity, peace and concord, and to us and all God’s servants, life everlasting ...

It brings to mind the Prophet's vision, the vision of the peaceable kingdom:

But they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree; and none shall make them afraid.

So we depart from the parish church, into a cold, dark November day, as the leaves fall, another Remembrance Sunday past. We remove our poppies for another year, our prayers offered for the fallen, for our national life, for the peace of all. 

May our observance of Remembrance Sunday, with its memories of bitter loss and great sacrifice, draws us to receive the Prophet's vision with a renewed gratitude, and with a deeper commitment to cherish, nurture, and defend a common life quietly, justly, peaceably ordered and governed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...