Skip to main content

'We see the great mystical body gradually enlarged': John Jebb on the 1662 commemoration of the faithful departed

In this All Saintstide, when prayerful commemoration of the faithful departed has particular significance, we turn to words from John Jebb, the Irish High Church theologian who became Bishop of Limerick in 1822 (until his death in 1833). Jebb noted that "commemoration of the pious dead ... had been in practice from the earliest times", was retained "in the first book of Edward". but omitted from 1552 "at the persuasion of Martin Bucer". The first sign of restoration of the primitive practice was in "the Prayer Book intended for Scotland, in 1637". The 1662 revisers "attending to the example of the Scotch Prayer Book, inserted a judicious, but most impressive, compendium of the old commemoration". 

It is a significant and revealing statement of a strain of Old High thought. Above all, there is what Jebb terms "a deep reverence for catholic antiquity". Related to this, there is an openness to the Prayer Books of 1549 and 1637. This forms the background for Jebb's exposition of the 1662 commemoration, seeing it as standing in continuity with patristic practice and 1549/1637.

He demonstrates that the 1662 form is no inadequate, weak commemoration, but - while appropriately judicious - theologically and devotionally rich:

It thanks God 'for all his servants departed this life in his faith and fear; beseeching him to give us grace so to follow their good example, that, with them, we may be partakers of God's heavenly kingdom.' It thanks God for them: therefore we are to regard them not merely with respect, but with interest; as qualified in themselves, and as designed by him whom we address, to be to us, and all who come after, a source of benefit and blessing ...

We implore 'grace to follow their good example; that, with them, we may be partakers of the heavenly kingdom': that is, we intreat Him, who has made this gracious provision for our improvement, that he would excite us to the contemplation of departed Christian excellence, and cooperate effectually with the contemplation thus excited. This, therefore, is a means, of more than human efficacy: it is a model for shaping our character both of mind and heart, and it is through the softening power of the Divine Spirit that we are to be made pliant to this exquisite model. The end is suitably exalted: it is, that being thus formed while here, we may be fitted for our destined place in the church triumphant; that being, in this state of preparation, united, in belief and practice, in mind and heart, to those who have gone before, who, 'being dead, yet speak,' we may hereafter participate in the same happiness, and mutually heighten our mutual bliss by the everlasting remembrance of benefits interchangeably communicated and received.

Thus, in the doctrine of Vincentius, in the doctrine of the Church of England, we see the realization of Saint Paul's magnificent figure: we see the great mystical body gradually enlarged, and ultimately perfected, by a self-contained and self-advancing principle; each part in strictest harmony with every other part, and all the parts promoting the completion of the whole. The whole body, 'fitly framed together, and compacted, by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working, in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body, unto the edifying of itself in love.' The mystical body, then, though at all times perfect in organization, is to gain its destined magnitude by slow degrees, and by continual accretion: and, consequently, the parts successively superadded must be made to accord with the antecedent parts; enlivened by one and the same animating spirit; operative by one and the same vital energy; aiding, not injuring, the general symmetry of the body.

Jebb brings us to see why the 1662 commemoration should continue to shape Anglican piety and liturgy in prayerful remembrance of the faithful departed. It is "judicious", avoiding unseemly and unnecessary speculation about the state of the faithful departed, trusting and resting in - to apply words from Article XVII - "God's promises ... as they be generally set forth to us in holy Scripture". The "that with them we" petition in the 1662 commemoration is entirely free of any urgent pleading for the faithful departed, which would obscure "God's promises ... as they be generally set forth to us in holy Scripture". Instead, it is a quiet and hope-filled petition that "all thy whole Church" would attain to the fulness of "thy heavenly kingdom". Quietly trusting in the grace of God in Christ, "our only mediator and advocate", it commends us all - living and departed - to our heavenly Father, as "we see the great mystical body gradually enlarged".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...