Skip to main content

'The best ways of entering into the secret': Taylor on the mystery of the Eucharist

In a recent post, laudable Practice drew attention to the Hookerian reverence for mystery and gift in Jeremy Taylor's understanding of the holy Eucharist in The Real Presence and Spiritual of Christ in the Blessed Sacrament (1654). Today's extract from The Worthy Communicant (1660) provides another example of Taylor's emphasis on the mystery of the Sacrament.  

Taylor evokes Eastern piety and liturgy, particularly the Liturgy of Saint James. This is one of the most significant and beautiful aspects of the passage, seeing the eucharistic mystery as celebrated in the ancient liturgies of the great Churches of the East in the Prayer Book Holy Communion and the eucharistic theology of the Articles.

Whatever propositions any man shall entertain in his manner of discoursing of these mysteries, let him be sure to take into his notice and memory those great appellatives with which the purest ages of the church, the most ancient liturgies, and the most eminent saints of God use to adorn and invest this great mysteriousness. In the Greek liturgy attributed to S. James, the sacramental symbols are called 'sanctified,' 'honourable,' 'precious,' 'celestial,' 'unspeakable,' 'incorruptible,' 'glorious,' 'fearful,' 'formidable,' 'divine ;' in the use of which epithets, as we have the warranty and consent of all the Greek churches since they ever had a liturgy, so we are taught only to have reverend usages and religious apprehensions of the divine mysteries; but if by any appellative we can learn a duty, it is one of the best ways of entering into the secret. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...