Skip to main content

Contours of conformity, 1662-1832: "reverence for Catholic antiquity"

In the series 'contours of conformity', exploring the nature of Anglican coherence and accord during the 'long 18th century', laudable Practice recently pointed to the "primitive piety" celebrated by William Beveridge in his sermon 'Steadfastness to the Established Church Recommended'. The sermon exemplified what Eamon Duffy described as "the new assurance" seen in the Church of the 1662 Settlement seeing in itself "primitive Christianity revived".

At the close of the 'long 18th century' the same lively confidence in Anglicanism as an expression of patristic faith was also evident in words from John Jebb, the Irish High Church theologian who became Bishop of Limerick in 1822 (until his death in 1833).  Jebb words were published in 1815 and republished, in a challenge to trends within Tractarianism (invoking patristic authorities against the Old High tradition), in 1839.

Set alongside Beveridge's sermon, we see a profound continuity over the 18th century in a confidence that Anglicanism embodied the faith of "Catholic antiquity":

The Church of England alone has adopted a middle course; moving in the same delightful path, and treading in the same hallowed footsteps, with Vincentius, and the Catholic bishops, and the ancient fathers; proceeding as far as they proceeded, and stopping where they stopped.

The last assertion will not be questioned. It will be allowed on all hands, that the Church of England does not proceed further than Vincentius and his compeers in reverence for Catholic antiquity. But it may be still accounted a reasonable question, whether she has proceeded so far.

The few, but powerful, authorities already produced in this discussion would seem to furnish a sufficient answer. That implicit reliance on the first four general councils, in the famous act of Elizabeth - that anxious caution in the canon of the same reign, lest preachers should overstep the limits of scripture and catholic tradition* - and that plain, direct appeal to tradition and the fathers, in the preface to our book of prayer**, these abundantly mark the character of our Church they establish, beyond all fair controversy, that the rule of Vincentius is her rule, and the practice of antiquity her sole legitimate practice.

*Referring to the Canon 6 of the 1571 Elizabethan Canons, directing preachers to teach "what is agreeable to the teaching of the Old or New Testament, and what the Catholic fathers and ancient bishops have collected from this selfsame doctrine".

**The 1549 'Concerning the Service of the Church', referred to "this godly and decent order of the ancient Fathers". The1662 Preface invoked "the whole Catholick Church of Christ" in defence of "ancient usage".

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more