Skip to main content

'So great efficacy'': another reason to wish that a certain type of contemporary evangelical Anglican heeded Calvin

Lord God our Father, 

through our Saviour Jesus Christ

you have assured your children of eternal life

and in baptism have made us one with him.

Deliver us from the death of sin

and raise us to new life in your love,

in the fellowship of the Holy Spirit,

by the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

For some it might be surprising that the post-Communion prayer from the Church of Ireland BCP 2004 - shared with the CofE's Common Worship - for the 'Second Sunday of Easter' (i.e. Low Sunday) can bring us to think about the sacramental theology of Calvin. The issue came to mind when this prayer was said on Sunday past, as I am aware that for a certain strain of contemporary evangelicalism in the CofI this reference to Baptism is, to put it charitably, problematic. (We will leave aside, for the moment, the fact that the subscription required of all clergy in the CofI declares that "the doctrine of the Church of Ireland" as set forth in the Book of Common Prayer is "agreeable to the Word of God".)

I have previously described this form of contemporary evangelicalism in the CofI as 'neo-puritanism'. It is, however, nothing of the sort: the Puritans, after all, had a developed sacramental theology and reverenced Baptism and the Supper as the Lord's Covenant Ordinances. Likewise, we can make no comparisons with the noble traditions of Baxter, the Wesleys, or Charles Simeon: all these had rich sacramental teaching. Instead, we are talking about an expression of transatlantic 21st century non-denominational evangelicalism. 

Against this strain of evangelicalism, with its rejection of reference to grace given in the Sacraments, we can turn to Calvin. It is very fitting that in his commentary on the Gospel reading for Low Sunday in the three year lectionary, John 20:19-31, Calvin firmly rebukes such an understanding:

let the reader observe, that with the visible and outward sign the word is also joined; for this is the source from which the sacraments derive their efficacy; not that the efficacy of the Holy Spirit is contained in the word which sounds in our ears, but because the effect of all those things which believers receive from the sacraments depends on the testimony of the word. Christ breathes on the Apostles: they receive not only the breathing, but also the Spirit. And why, but because Christ promises to them?

In like manner, in baptism we put on Christ, (Galatians 3:27,) we are washed by his blood, (Revelation 1:5,) our old man is crucified, (Romans 6:6,) in order that the righteousness of God may reign in us. In the Holy Supper we are spiritually fed with the flesh and blood of Christ. Whence do they derive so great efficacy but from the promise of Christ, who does and accomplishes by his Holy Spirit what he declares by his word? 

To regard the phrase "and in baptism have made us one with him" as somehow problematic is, as Calvin demonstrates, to disregard the divine institution of the Sacrament, the word of Christ accompanying it, and the work of the Holy Spirit by means of it. Indeed, as Calvin makes clear, it is to disregard the teaching of Holy Scripture. (Which, by the way, brings us back to CofI clergy assenting that the doctrine of the BCP is "agreeable to the Word of God".)

In the CofI, it is not unusual to hear this strain of evangelicalism described by some ecclesial opponents as 'Calvinists'. Nothing could be further from the truth. Such evangelicals - very far removed from classical Reformed Anglicanism - are not in any meaningful way shaped by the teachings of Calvin, not least in their understanding of the Sacraments. Rather, we should wish that there were, for Calvin's sacramental teaching is infinitely richer than the thin gruel of transatlantic 21st century non-denominational evangelicalism. 

(The picture is the depiction on the Monument de la Reformation of the first administration of Holy Baptism according to the Reformed rite in Geneva, by Pierre Viret, in 1534.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...