Skip to main content

Solus Christus, George Herbert, and the sober minimalism of Anglican claims

Many thanks to The Anglican Way for publishing my essay 'George Herbert, Anglican Modesty, and the Season of Lent'. Below, an excerpt in which I offer something of a defence of the oft-misunderstood and misused words of Fisher: "We have no doctrine of our own. We only possess the Catholic doctrine of the Catholic Church enshrined in the Catholic Creeds, and these creeds we hold without addition or diminution". I understand Fisher's words as a "sober minimalism" regarding any distinctive Anglican claims, defining the church by a reliance upon the Christological centre, on solus Christus:

In ‘Love (III)’, as [Rowan] Williams states, "the point is that acceptance of the divine love simply requires the abandonment of all effort at assessing my own worth, negatively or positively". It is the action of the Triune God in Christ that is the Church's foundation, centre, and life: an over-active, loud, argumentative, zealous proclamation of some other basis - whether institutional or experiential - for understanding the Church can too easily obscure this. God in Christ is at work in prayer, Word, and Sacrament, sustaining and renewing the Church. This is sufficient. Here the Church is to rest.

In ‘Aaron’, the "poor priest" has no claim but "Christ is my only head, My alone-only heart and breast". Thus, "Aaron's drest": Anglican orders commend themselves by ministering Christ in Word and Sacrament, "who is not dead, But lives in me while I do rest". And so, at the Holy Communion, the priest in the temple is called "not only to receive God, but to break, and administer him"; the parson administers Baptism, "a blessing, that the world hath not the like"; and as for preaching, "the character of his Sermon is Holiness; he is not witty, or learned, or eloquent, but Holy". What more is required? "God cannot be wanting to them in Doctrine, to whom he is so gracious in Life."

If there is an Anglican modesty - indeed, a sober minimalism when it comes to any distinctive Anglican claims (Fisher's "we have no doctrine of our own") - it is because of this, the sufficiency of the Church's Christological centre. It is the word of Christ, in Scripture and Sacrament, which gives life to and sustains the Church, not exalted institutional or experiential claims. With a Lenten penitence, such too often haughty claims are to be abandoned for solus Christus. This is what we behold in the life, witness, and words of George Herbert. He is, as Malcolm Guite beautifully puts it, the "Gentle exemplar": such gentleness itself flows from and returns to the Christological centre

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more