Skip to main content

'The deep mid-channel of the Church's course': a late 19th century Old High vision of Deep Anglicanism

In his 1872 primary visitation charge, William Connor Magee, Bishop of Peterborough, had - as previous posts explored - robustly critiqued Anglo-papalism, neo-Puritan evangelicalism, and advanced liberalism. He goes on, however, to provide a significant and powerful account of what we might term 'Deep Anglicanism', in which the three streams - High, Low, and Broad - mutually enrich each other, all part of "the deep mid-channel of the Church's course":

In truth, each of these parties, little as it might be disposed to own it, has learned, is learning, much from the other two. There is more of Evangelicalism in the High Churchman, more of High Church principle in the Evangelical, more of Dogma in the Broad Churchman than would flow from their own avowed principles but which comes for each from the influence of those to whom he is most opposed. Candid and earnest men of all parties are learning to recognize this more and more; are coming to understand that it is not given to any one School, or to any one Age, any more than to any one man, to see truth on all sides; but that it is rather by the assertion, the necessarily one-sided assertion, of different aspects of truth, that the whole body of the truth can be preserved. And so each comes in turn, not only to endure, but to value the presence of the other in the Church, to feel that there is an appointed and an important work for each one of them to do, which can be done by that one only. And thus while extreme men on either side are pushing their views to extreme lengths, standing as far apart as possible, denouncing each other so loudly and so bitterly, that it might be thought the Church must speedily be torn asunder by their strife, the Church herself — larger, wider, greater than any one of the parties within her — may be gaining from their very strife a larger and a firmer grasp of the truths of which she is the guardian — a clearer perception of the limits beyond which her children may not safely stray; the very errors and excesses of each party, their very shipwrecks of the Faith, sad as they are to see, serving to buoy out on the right hand and on the left the deep mid-channel of the Church's course. It is to this growth of a sound and loyal Churchmanship — taught in turn and learned in turn by each of the great parties in our Church — that we must look under God for her safe passage through the troubled waters on which she is now tossing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...