Skip to main content

A goodly heritage: Herbert's 'The British Church'

George Herbert's 'The British Church' exemplifies the native pride in the ecclesia Anglicana which was a defining characteristic of the avante garde conformists and Laudians, a native pride bequeathed to the Old High Church tradition.

It might be suggested that this native pride in our "dear mother" was what primarily set avante garde conformists and Laudians apart from conforming Calvinists.  For the latter, as Diarmaid MacCulloch points out, the Church of England was merely one of a number of Reformed churches, amongst whom others also were episcopally governed and had liturgical worship. 

By contrast, avante garde conformists and Laudians rejoiced in the particular character of what the Laudian Bramhall termed "the Britannick Churches".  There is perhaps more than an echo here of Hooker's praise for "the Churches ... within this Realme, By the goodnes of almightie God and his servant Elizabeth we are" (LEP Book V, Dedication 10).  Whereas the Reformed churches on the continent were overwhelmed in many places by the forces of the Counter-Reformation, the ecclesia Anglicana had been providentially delivered from Armada and Gunpowder Plot.  Whereas the Reformed churches on the continent were riven by divisions arising from Arminianism and Socinianism, the unity and orthodoxy of the ecclesia Anglicana was secured through the Royal Supremacy:

We hold it most agreeable to this Our Kingly Office, and Our own religious Zeal, to conserve and maintain the Church committed to Our Charge, in Unity of true Religion, and in the Bond of Peace; and not to suffer unnecessary Disputations, Altercations, or Questions to be raised, which may nourish Faction both in the Church and Commonwealth (from His Majesty's Declaration, prefixed to the Book of the Articles of Religion).

And the Royal Supremacy was central to "the Britannick Churches".  Under Elizabeth I it ensured that avante garde conformity took root in the Church of England, and stood robustly against those seeking 'further Reformation'.  In Scotland, James VI/I had reintroduced episcopacy and with the 1618 Articles of Perth conformed significant aspects of Scottish liturgical practice to that of the ecclesia Anglicana.  In Ireland, the 1634 adoption of the Articles of Religion and of new Canons demonstrated the unity of the "Britannick Churches". As historian John McCafferty has stated, they were "centred on a royal, not Canterburian, supremacy". 

As Herbert celebrates, the "British Church" was marked by a liturgical beauty "Neither too mean nor yet too gay".  While "She on the hills" was characterised by Baroque, Tridentine opulence, and "She in the valley" lacked any decent order, the "British Church" kept "The mean".  In Cranmer's words:

without some Ceremonies it is not possible to keep any order or quiet discipline in the Church.

If there is one word which captures this "mean" it is "decent", a term which consistently appears in the various directions ordering the worship of the ecclesia Anglicana, and which contrasts with both "painted shrines" and she who "nothing wears".

Here we see Herbert capturing a defining aspect of the native piety of what would become the Old High Church tradition, the sense of "a goodly heritage" (Ps.16:7).  Neither enamoured with Geneva nor casting longing looks across the Tiber, but rejoicing in the British Church.

I joy, dear mother, when I view
Thy perfect lineaments, and hue
Both sweet and bright.
Beauty in thee takes up her place,
And dates her letters from thy face,
When she doth write.

A fine aspect in fit array,
Neither too mean nor yet too gay,
Shows who is best.
Outlandish looks may not compare,
For all they either painted are,
Or else undress'd.

She on the hills which wantonly
Allureth all, in hope to be
By her preferr'd,
Hath kiss'd so long her painted shrines,
That ev'n her face by kissing shines,
For her reward.

She in the valley is so shy
Of dressing, that her hair doth lie
About her ears;
While she avoids her neighbour's pride,
She wholly goes on th' other side,
And nothing wears.

But, dearest mother, what those miss,
The mean, thy praise and glory is
And long may be.
Blessed be God, whose love it was
To double-moat thee with his grace,
And none but thee.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...