Skip to main content

Bramhall, the Eucharist, and a generous patristic orthodoxy

In An answer to Monsieur de la Militiere (1653) - a response to a Roman apologist - Bramhall invokes the diverse expressions of patristic eucharistic theology in East and West to defend the Church of England's rejection of transubstantiation.  He also points to diverse eucharistic practices in the patristic churches, justifying the historic diversity of practice East and West, and within the West after the Reformation.  Underpinning this generous orthodoxy are twin affirmations made by Bramhall prior to this section.  Firstly, that "The Holy Eucharist, which is the Sacrament of peace and unity, ought not to be made the matter of strife and contention". Secondly, the belief in "a true Real Presence; which no genuine son of the Church of England did ever deny ... Christ said, 'This is My Body'; what He said, we do steadfastly believe".

We may well find different observations in those days: as one Church consecrating leavened bread, another unleavened; one Churclı making use of pure wine, another of wine mixed with water; one Church admitting infants to the Communion, another not admitting them: but without controversies, or censures, or animosity one against the other. We find no debates or disputes concerning the Presence of Christ's Body in the Sacrament, and much less concerning the manner of His Presence, for the first 800 years.

Yet all the time we find as different expressions among those primitive Fathers, as among our modern writers at this present day: some calling the Sacrament 'the Sign of Christ's Body' [Augustine] - 'the Figure of His Body' [Tertullian] - 'the Symbol of His Body' [Victor of Antioch] - 'the Mystery of His Body' [Chrysostom] - 'the Exemplar', 'Type' [Augustine], and 'Representation, of His Body' [Tertullian], saying 'that the Elements do not recede from their first nature' [Theodoret]; others naming it 'the true Body and Blood of Christ' [Hilary], 'changed, not in shape, but in nature' [Cyprian]; yea, doubting not to say, that in this Sacrament 'we see Christ' - 'we touch Christ - 'we eat Christ' - 'that we fasten our teeth in His very Flesh, and make our tongues red in His Blood' [Chrysostom]. Yet, notwithstanding, there were no questions, no quarrels, no contentions amongst them; there needed no Councils to order them, no conferences to reconcile them; because they contented themselves to believe what Christ had said, 'This is My Body' - without presuming on their own heads to determine the manner how it is His Body; neither weighing all their own words so exactly before any controversy was raised, nor expounding the sayings of other men contrary to the analogy of Faith.

From The Works of The Most Reverend Father in God, John Bramhall, Volume I.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more