Skip to main content

"All such as be studious of peace": Casaubon and the eirenic, generous orthodoxy of King James I

In another example of the eirenic, generous orthodoxy urged by James VI/I, Casaubon in his Answer to Cardinal Perron (1612) invoked a liberty on "things not necessary" as a means of promoting peace between national churches on opposing sides of the Reformation divide. Here again James and Casaubon both look back to Hooker, with his insistence that there can be unity and communion between national churches upholding different ceremonies, for the Church catholic can have "without offence or breach of concord her manifold varieties in rites and ceremonies of religion" (LEP V.68.6). Similarly, James and Casaubon also anticipate the Laudian vision - shared with Grotius - of a Union of Churches of the Northern Kingdoms, including the Gallican church.  

Wherefore his Maiestie thinketh that there is no more compendious way to the making of peace, then that things necessarie should be diligently separated from things not necessarie: that all endeauours might be spent about the agreement in the necessarie, and as touching the not necessarie, that a Christian libertie might bee granted. Simply necessarie, his Maiestie calleth those things, which the word of God expressely chargeth to be beleeued, or practised: or which the ancient Church by necessarie consequence, hath drawne out of the word of God. But such things, which out of the institution of men, although with a religious, and wise intent, yet besides the word of God, were receiued, and vsed of the Church for a time, those he thinketh may be changed, or relaxed, or abolished ... If this distinction were vsed for the deciding of the controuersies of these times, and if men would ingenuously make a difference betwixt diuine, and positiue law, it seems that amongst godly and moderate men, touching things absolutely necessarie, there would bee no long, or bitter contention. For both (as I said euen now) they are not many, and they are almost equally allowed of by the name of Christian. And his excellent Maiestie doth hold this distinction to be of such moment for the diminishing of controuersies, which at this time doe so vexe the Church of God, that he iudgeth it the dutie of all such as bee studious of peace, diligently to explane it, to teach it, to urge it. 

It is another reason why Hampton's account of Reformed Conformity as the 'orthodoxy' of the Jacobean Church needs to be significantly qualified.  The eirenic, generous orthodoxy of James and Casaubon does not at all easily fit with the Reformed Conformist critique of Rome and Lutheranism, and the insistence on the need for doctrinal definitions "for the deciding of the controversies of these times". While the generous, peaceable orthodoxy of James and Casaubon could comprehend Reformed Conformity, it had a significantly larger and more generous vision of the Church catholic, for those "things absolutely necessary ... are almost equally allowed of by all" Christians.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more