Skip to main content

"Thus, then, sins are forgiven": Jelf's Bampton Lectures on the ministry of reconciliation

In the third of his 1844 Bampton Lectures, An inquiry into the means of grace, their mutual connection, and combined use, with especial reference to the Church of England, Jelf - one of those whom Nockles lists as the 'Zs', the post-1833 continuation of the Old High tradition - offered a classic Old High account of the ministry of reconciliation given to the ordained.  Contrary to Tractarian and later Anglo-catholic accounts which interpreted this to be private confession and absolution - an interpretation far removed from the lived experience of most Anglicans, in the 19th century and now - Jelf and the Old High tradition provided a vision of the ministry of reconciliation rooted in and expressed through the parson's ministry of Word and Sacrament.

This understanding had deep roots in the Laudian tradition. Richard Montague stated, "Reconciling by the whole office and function of the ministry".  Likewise Jeremy Taylor said of the use of the dominical words at the Ordering of Priests, "they are comprehensive of the whole power and ministry ecclesiastical".

For another mid-19th century example of the significance and vibrancy of this Old High understanding of the ministry of reconciliation, defined against Tractarian influences, Christopher Wordsworth's 1874 pastoral letter to his Diocese of Lincoln should be read. 

Here, however, is Jelf in 1844, describing the classical Old High vision of the ministry of reconciliation:

the whole "ministry of reconciliation" is entrusted to the regularly ordained Clergy, as, in their degree, the heirs of the Apostles. It is their office exclusively to publish the glad tidings with authority, to preach the word of God, and to minister the holy Sacraments in the congregation. He that preaches "Christ crucified" extends the benefits of the Sacrifice of the Cross; he that administers holy Baptism, does it for the forgiveness of sins, loosing men from the bands of Satan, and bringing them into the liberty of the sons of God; he that administers the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper, imparts ministerially the Communion of the Body and Blood of Christ; he that layeth hands upon fresh labourers and sendeth them into the Lord's vineyard, multiplies the channels and instruments through whom these offices of mercy are extended to mankind ... Thus, then, sins are forgiven for Christ's sake alone, and by virtue only of His authority; and yet by means of the subordinate instrumentality of the Word and the Sacraments, on the one hand, and of the stewards of His mysteries on the other. The Word and Sacraments are, considered by themselves, means of grace; God's Minister is another; yet ordinarily their combined agency is required to the full spiritual effect; a reciprocal relation which clearly evinces the good Providence of God, in securing both to our use.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...