Skip to main content

"Set forth and summed up in the Apostles' and Nicene Creeds": An early PECUSA sermon for Trinity Sunday

Following on from yesterday's post, which presented the case for PECUSA omitting the Athanasian Creed from its BCP 1789 and 1801 Articles of Religion, an extract from a Trinity Sunday sermon by Cornelius Roosevelt Duffie, Rector of Saint Thomas, New York City, 1824-27. Duffie, a convert to Episcopalianism from the Baptist tradition, stood firmly within the Hobartian tradition, the American expression of the Old High tradition. 

It is this which makes his sermon particularly interesting, for here he gives a defence of the PECUSA decision to omit the Athanasian Creed from liturgy and Articles. Echoing a significant tradition of theologically orthodox thought in 18th century Anglicanism, with its roots in Taylor, he notes of the doctrine of the Trinity that it is "safest, in reference to so sublime a mystery, to speak in few words". On this basis, he defends the omission of the Athanasian Creed: such omission is understood, therefore, to serve rather than undermines Trinitarian faith. This, then, is a voice from within early PECUSA clearly stating that the omission of the Athanasian Creed was for orthodox, not heterodox, reasons.

Note too the presence of some other characteristics of what I have described in previous posts as the 'Trinitarian minimalism' of Anglicanism in the long 18th century: the insistence that Trinitarian faith is revealed in Scripture; the "danger of going astray in the multitude and fulness of exposition"; and that the Apostles' and Nicene Creed are the sufficient statement of Trinitarian faith.

Duffie's sermon, in other words, exemplifies how the omission of the Athanasian Creed was no obstacle to - indeed Duffie contends that it aids - the proclamation of confident Trinitarian belief in early PECUSA, standing in continuity with the well-established, coherent, orthodox 'Trinitarian minimalism' of 18th century Anglicanism.

The doctrine of the Trinity, or the belief in one God, existing in three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, as it has been maintained at all times and in all places, and by the great body of the universal Church, is most clearly the doctrine of Scripture, when received in its integrity, and interpreted with candour, and is set forth and summed up in the Apostles' and Nicene Creeds ...

The most material part of the Apostles' Creed, was certainly used from the apostles' times, and was probably comprised in these words, "I believe in God, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost." This was evidently a proper avowal of faith for them to make, who, when they were received into the Church, were baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." But as the simplicity of this creed gave opportunity to some to put upon the words unscriptural and erroneous constructions, it became necessary, from time to time, to exclude such constructions, wherever they obtained, by a fuller and more definite exposition of the true belief. This accordingly appears to have been done at different and successive periods, until to the first form of simple assent succeeded the present Apostles' Creed, and those others which I have noticed. 

The difficulty, however, of expressing any doctrine in words which should be so definite as to be incapable of being perverted, the necessity of often elucidating what has been already defined, and the danger of going astray in the multitude and fulness of exposition, and thereby occasioning those very errors which it was intended to refute, all these difficulties, increased by the nature of the subject now before us, (one so far above our reach,) fix a limit to minute definition, and make it safest, in reference to so sublime a mystery, to speak in few words, and "to press closely in the footsteps of Scripture." Our Church has, therefore, adopted only the two forms of creed which I first noticed, (the Apostles' and the Nicene,) which we are assured "may be proved by most certain warrants of the holy Scripture."

The doctrine of the Trinity in unity, as set forth in those creeds, and founded upon the apostolic commission, is proposed by the Church in like manner as it was received, as a matter of pure revelation; and it would seem, therefore, that the only question among those who acknowledge the Scriptures, should be, whether the doctrine be therein contained or not; and that upon this fact alone the belief or rejection of it should rest.

(The painting is George Harvey, 'Nightfall, St. Thomas Church, Broadway, New York', c. 1837.) 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...