'We are now passing to the Eucharistic part of the service': The first versicles at Matins and Evensong

As we continue to read through John Shepherd's A Critical and Practical Elucidation of the Morning and Evening Prayer of the Church of England (1796), we come to the versicles and responses after the Confession, Absolution, and first Lord's Prayer. Leaving aside the Gloria Patri for consideration next week, what is striking about Shepherd's treatment of these versicles is his explicit recognition of their eucharistic character.

This points to an important aspect of Sunday Matins as a main liturgy (as, of course, was the case for most of Anglican history). Prayer Book Matins and Evensong have a deeply eucharistic character, ensuring that both thanksgiving and anamnesis can be a significant part of Anglican liturgy where Matins was - and is - the normative Sunday liturgy.

These four Versicles, which we find in the most ancient Liturgies, are selected from that excellent repository of devotion, the Book of Psalms. The introduction of them here, after the Confession, Absolution, and Lord's Prayer; and before Gloria Patri and the Psalms, appointed for the day, is a most wise regulation of the Church. They are intended to connect the preceding penitential part of the service, to which they properly belong, with the Eucharistic part which immediately follows ...

The first, that is, the penitential part of the service being completed, we proceed to the Eucharistic; or "to render thanks to God, for the great benefits that we have received at his hands," and by repeating a portion of the book of psalms "to set forth his most worthy praise" ...

To the question, Why Alleluia [i.e. 'Praise ye the Lord'] is placed here, we reply, that, as the words "let us pray," are ofttimes premised to excite attention to the prayer ensuing, or to intimate a transition from one mode of prayer to another; so "praise ye the Lord" is an indication, that we are now passing, from the penitential to the Eucharistic part of the service.

Comments

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders. With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter. The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition). Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical). Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics". Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics. What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition. Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School. Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979. We ...

laudable Practice

Search This Blog