Skip to main content

"The hedges of liberty are broken down": Duché's 1775 fast day sermon to the Continental Congress

On 12th June 1775, the Second Continental Congress - weeks after Lexington and Concord, and only days before Bunker Hill - issued a proclamation calling for the inhabitants of the American colonies to observe 20th July as "a day of public humiliation, fasting, and prayer", seeking the "gracious interposition of Heaven" in order to aid "a speedy end ... to the civil discord between Great Britain and the American colonies, without farther effusion of blood".

And so it was on 20th July that the members of the Continental Congress gathered in Christ Church, Philadelphia, to hear Jacob Duché - Rector of Christ Church - preach on a text from Psalm 80, "Turn thee again, thou God of hosts, look down from heaven: behold, and visit this vine". The sermon's title identified the vine: 'The American Vine'. As with the vine in the psalm, the American Vine was blessed with goodly roots and soil, allowing it to flourish:

Our sober Ancestors brought over with them, not only the several useful arts and improvements, of which the natives were ignorant, but a treasure of infinitely greater value, even the charter of temporal freedom, and the records of eternal truth. The banners of Christian and British Liberty were at once unfolded, and these remote parts of the earth were thereby added to the Messiah's kingdom.

Now, however, the American Vine was assaulted, in like manner to the vine of the psalm: "The wild boar out of the wood doth root it up: and the wild beasts of the field devour it". 

Our morning joys are past and a night of heaviness succeeds. The hedges of liberty, by which we hoped our vineyeard was secured, are broken down, and they that pass by the way, are seeking to pluck our grapes.

'Tis not indeed the wild boar out of the wood, or the wild beast of the field, that are ready to waste and devour it. 'Tis not now a foreign enemy, or the savages of our own wilderness, that have made the cruel and unrighteous assault - But it is even, thou, Britain, that with merciless and unhallowed hands, wouldst cut down and destroy this branch of thine own vine, the very branch, which Providence hath made strong even for thyself!

As was appropriate for a "day of public humiliation", Duché regarded what he termed "the flames of an unnatural war" an occasion for self-examination and repentance:

Injured and oppressed as we are, unmeriting the harsh and rigorous treatment, which we have received from such an unexpected quarter, let us, however, look up to an higher cause for the awful infliction; and whilst we are faithfully persevering in the defence of our temporal rights, let us humble ourselves before God, lay our hands upon our hearts, and seriously and impartially enquire, what returns we have made to Heaven for its past favours, and whether its present chastisements have not been drawn down upon us by a gross neglect of our spiritual privileges.

The conclusion of the sermon reflected on the call given by the civil magistrate - in this case, the Continental Congress - to join in prayer and fasting:

Let us adore, then, the divine wisdom and goodness, for putting it into the hearts of that Honourable Assembly, now entrusted with the great cause of American Liberty, to call upon the whole people, whom they represent, in the most solemn and affectionate manner, to join in deprecating the Divine displeasure, by one general act of religious humiliation. Heaven be praised, that they have hereby shewn their attention and zeal for our eternal as well as temporal welfare.

What is most striking about the sermon are the characteristics it shares with those sermons which encouraged loyalty to the Crown. We see the same emphasis on British liberty, as heirs of the Revolution of 1688; on civil war as an expression of divine judgement; on such division and conflict as an occasion for repentance; on the gift of a peaceable constitutional order; and on the rightful role of the civil magistrate in calling for such fast days.

Likewise, we might note how the proclamation of the Continental Congress, calling for a fast day on 20th July 1775, used wording very similar indeed to what which would be found in the 1776 Royal Proclamation for a General Fast:

The King: putting Our Trust in Almighty God ... send up Our Prayers and Supplications to the Divine Majesty;

The Continental Congress: the Great Governor of the World, by his supreme and universal Providence ... our joint supplications to the all-wise, omnipotent and merciful Disposer of all events;

The King: for averting those heavy Judgements, which Our manifold Sins and Provocations have most justly deserved;

The Continental Congress: unfeignedly confess and deplore our many sins

The King: to deliver Our loyal Subjects within Our Colonies and Provinces in North America from the Violence, Injustice, and Tyranny of those daring Rebels who have assumed to themselves the Exercise of Arbitrary Power;

The Continental Congress: securing the just rights and priviledges of the colonies ... the restoration of her invaded rights.

When Duché entered the pulpit of Christ Church Philadelphia on 20th July 1775, with the members of the Continental Congress assembled before him, it was a very traditional scene and message: a representative assembly, committed to the liberties of 1688-89, had issued a proclamation for a fast day, and was now hearing a sermon whose main characteristics were indistinguishable from those sermons delivered on fast days proclaimed by the Crown during the American War, and heard by the House of Commons and the House of Lords. 

Here, in other words, was a traditionally Anglican scene.  The constitutional context was different but, as with the changes to the state prayers in 1776, it is continuity, not revolutionary change, that is most evident. 

(The painting is William Russell Birch, 'Second Street north from Market St. wth. Christ Church', 1828. Christ Church was built between 1727 and 1744, with the steeple added in 1754.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...