"The fair limits of the Church of England": Lonsdale on comprehension and the Church's peace

From The Life of John Lonsdale (1868) - Bishop of Lichfield 1843-67 and exemplar of the Old High tradition - a description of his commitment to comprehension, wonderfully summarised in the phrase "the fair limits of the Church of England".

I do not mean that his impartiality ever led him to promote men of very extreme opinions: for he considered all such opinions mischievous in themselves and tending to division - the great evil always before his eyes. He did 'mark them which cause divisions.' Where he found such men in possession he made the best of them: often saying that such a person was a capital man' (a favourite phrase of his), but it was a pity he was such a high or low churchman, as the case might be.

He said to one of his Rural Deans, of a low-church clergyman to whom he had given a living, 'I am not placed here to be the bishop of the high church, or of the low church. It is my duty to look with equal eyes upon all who do their work heartily and well within the fair limits of the Church of England.'

This commitment of the Old High tradition to a comprehension serving the peace and quiet of the Church on the basis of generous conformity to Prayer Book and Articles can also be seen, for example, in early 19th century statements by Horsley.

It represents quite different concerns and commitments to those seen in the aggressive, divisive populism of Sacheverell and the early 18th century High Church tradition during the 'Rage of Party'. It does, however, have deep roots in older, formative, irenic currents of thought in the Church of England: in the nature of the Elizabethan Settlement; in Hooker's vision; in the concerns of the Jacobean and Caroline Church amidst doctrinal controversy; in aspects of Cambridge Platonism and Latitudinarianism; and in the words of Jeremy Taylor, for "The Church of England speaks moderate words, apt to be construed to the purposes of all peaceable Men that desire her Communion".

Gratefully receiving this peaceable vision, and protecting it against those who would disrupt the church's common life in pursuit of their own narrow, partisan visions, was a defining feature of the Old High tradition. It is a characteristic that contemporary Anglicanism might wisely retrieve in a cultural and ecclesial context marked by embittered culture wars and renewed sectarianism.

Comments

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders. With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter. The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition). Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical). Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics". Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics. What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition. Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School. Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979. We ...

laudable Practice

Search This Blog