Skip to main content

Ubi scriptum? An Old High declaration of sola scriptura

On this Saint Patrick's Day, words from an 1829 sermon by Richard Mant, Bishop of Down and Connor, entitled 'The Visible Church of Christ: the United Church of England and Ireland a True and Sound Part of it'. In this extract, Mant - a noted Old High divine - sets forth a defence of sola scriptura as patristic and catholic. And so, "no article of faith, which was not plainly laid down in Scripture" could be proclaimed by the Church or required of Christians: as affirmed by Article VI of the Articles of Religion, Scripture is "the full and perfect rule for the Church of Christ". 

Agreeable to this was the universal testimony of the primitive Christians, both in the Apostolical times, and in those which immediately, and afterwards for many ages uninterruptedly succeeded. The Scriptures, which the Apostles had acknowledged or delivered, the Churches constantly received for their own direction, and regularly transmitted to their posterity. Upon these scriptures they grounded their faith: to these scriptures they still appealed as the foundation of their doctrines: they still argued from these scriptures in proof of their doctrines: they still condemned all doctrines, which were not contained in these scriptures: and if at any time they brought forward human authorities to justify their opinions or expressions, they did so for the purpose of showing that they were not chargeable with any innovation, in the doctrine or in the manner of expressing it; still referring for the origin and groundwork of their doctrine to the testimony of the written word of God.

In that word the collective body of doctrines, of which all Christians made publick confession, and on which all their hopes of salvation depended, were all contained: and they agreed in no article of faith, which was not plainly laid down in scripture. "If we inquire," observes Bishop Jeremy Taylor, "upon what grounds the primitive Church did rely for their whole religion, we shall find they knew none else but the scriptures. Ubi scriptum? was their first inquiry. Do the Prophets and the Apostles, the Evangelists or the Epistles say so? Read it there, and then teach it: else reject it". They call upon their charges in the words of Christ, "Search the scriptures": they affirm that the scriptures are a full, that they are a perfect rule; that they contain all things necessary to salvation; and from hence they confute all heresies."

In a word, by a continued succession of the most distinguished writers in the first ages of the Church; by the full and unanimous testimony of the most ancient, learned, and orthodox fathers in supporting the proposition, and by the total silence of all in denying it, proof might be easily adduced, as indeed it has been abundantly adduced by eminent men [a footnote here points to the authorities invoked by Taylor in his Second part of the Dissuasive from Popery], that the Scriptures are the word of God, and contain in them all the word of God with which we have any concern, and so are the full and perfect rule for the Church of Christ.

Nay, the very title, which the Catholick Church hath always given to the Scriptures, calling them "the Canon," the rule, the very model prescribed to Christians for the formation of their faith and practice, shows her sense of their sufficiency and completeness; and is a convincing proof that she looked to them, and to them only, for the revelation of the will, and the record of the word, of God.

Mant's Old High defence of sola scriptura, given just four years before the Movement of 1833 commenced, is testimony to how the Old High tradition thoroughly and robustly affirmed this Reformation principle, in contrast to the account given by the Tractarians of the relationship between Scripture and 'Tradition'. Against such ambiguities and confusions, it was Mant who was to be echoed in the Declaration of 1870, as "this the Ancient Catholick and Apostolick Church of Ireland" affirmed that the fullness of the Faith was contained - sufficient and complete - in holy Scripture:

The Church of Ireland doth, as heretofore, accept and unfeignedly believe all the Canonical Scriptures of the Old and New Testament, as given by inspiration of God, and containing all things necessary to salvation; and doth continue to profess the faith of Christ as professed by the Primitive Church.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...