Skip to main content

'Like lost sheep': penitence and the Prayer Book

Almighty and most merciful Father, We have erred, and strayed from thy ways like lost sheep, We have followed too much the devices and desires of our own hearts, We have offended against thy holy laws ...

The general Confession at Morning and Evening Prayer opens by invoking our "most merciful Father", placing us alongside the Prodigal - ashamed, hungry, journeying back from the far country, utterly reliant on the Father's grace in Christ:

And he arose, and came to his father. But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him.

'Almighty' does not contradict this. In fact, it assures us that this love and mercy flows eternally from our "most merciful Father". In the words of Article XVII, this "is full of sweet, pleasant, and unspeakable comfort".

We have erred, and strayed from thy ways like lost sheep ...

It is a phrase deeply rooted in the scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. As the Prophet declares, "All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way". When we utter this phrase in the general Confession, we acknowledge that we stand with faithless Israel, recklessly straying from the good and wholesome pastures. As the late Sir Roger Scruton put it:

Like sheep we go astray; and like sheep we stray as a crowd. Moreover, sheep that stray from their pasture are making a huge mistake: they are venturing into territory where they are no longer protected ... The right course for those sheep who have strayed into unknown territory is to go back through the hole in the hedge. This is the essence of the religious life: not progress and experiment, but the journey back to the place that protects us.

To acknowledge that we are indeed sheep who have foolishly, recklessly "gone astray" is also to give expression to our dependence upon the Good Shepherd who searches for us and brings us home, to remember that this parable applies to us. We are not to delude ourselves that we are the wise, righteous sheep who have stayed in the fold: "And the Pharisees and scribes murmured, saying, This man receiveth sinners, and eateth with them".

We have followed too much the devices and desires of our own hearts ...

It is, perhaps, the most powerfully counter-cultural phrase in the general Confession. Our hearts are not to be followed, for - in the words of the prophet Jeremiah - "The heart is deceitful above all things". Can we really look around at the cultural and social wreckage of the late 20th and early 21st century North Atlantic societies, and not recognise that 'follow your heart' radical individualism has been profoundly destructive? "The heart is deceitful above all things." And yet we do follow our hearts, their devices and desires, wounding our souls and the souls of those around us. 

We have offended against thy holy laws ...

It is a phrase not found in many contemporary Anglican liturgies. Our awkward embarrassment at the very notion of "thy holy laws" means that reference to God's commandments and laws - outside of the Psalter and readings from Scripture (itself, of course, a revealing state of affairs) - is incredibly rare. This is a significant loss. As Rowan Williams has said of the Ten Commandments, urging a much more serious attention to them by the contemporary church, they are the "ethical foundation" of Christian moral teaching, setting forth what is due to God and neighbour. To confess "We have offended against thy holy laws" is to acknowledge how we have acted contrary to that which has been divinely bestowed for our individual and communal flourishing.

There is much that has been lost with the disappearance in many places of the tradition of Sunday Morning Prayer as a regular service. Amongst the greatest of these losses are the theologically and spiritually rich opening words of the general Confession.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...