Skip to main content

'Justice and Equity do very often lie in the way of a present Interest': a Burnet sermon for the Third Sunday in Lent

From a Sermon preached before the Queen, at Whitehall, on the 11th March, 1694 being the third Sunday in Lent, by Burnet, Bishop of Salisbury, on the text I Corinthians 1:26:

If the mighty are prejudiced against Religion, it is by reason of those ill qualities that commonly creep upon the Men of Power. Justice and Equity do very often lie in the way of a present Interest. Impartial Proceedings require Impartial Minds. The thoughts of a Judgment to come, must be very unacceptable to him that perverts Judgment and Justice. He who is not content with what he hath, cannot be easie while he sees that his Neighbour has more than himself: Or that he has that which would very much accommodate himself, and which he might come at, if it were not for such an importunate Rule as is that of doing as one would be done by. He who has been successful in his Injustice and Violence, cannot easily receive a Doctrine which brings him under indispensable Obligations of restoring all that he has unjustly acquired. The Horrors of Guilt, the Tears of the Oppressed, and the cry of Blood that pursues them, would arise too fast, and be heard too sensibly by them, if they admitted such a secret Monitor as true Religion would prove to them. When Felix heard the Doctrines of Temperance, Justice, and a Judgment to come, he trembled indeed, but yet he sent away the Preacher, putting him off to a more convenient time. And whereas no Man is in danger to be much corrupted by the Flatteries of others, till he has accustomed himself to such kind Thoughts of his own supposed Worth, that he easily believes that all others are as favourable to him as he himself is, the severe Reflections that will arise out of this Holy Doctrine will soon take off the Visar, and make him see himself in his own Deformity, and that perhaps in the most odious appearances. In a word, unless this Man of Power and Dominion, can free his Mind from the false Notions he has of his own Glory and Authority, he cannot receive the Christian Religion, but with great aversion, since his Nature and his Habits are so totally opposite to its chief Tendency and Design. Yet this arises not from any Contradiction that it has to the true Ends of Power and Government, as if these were incompatible, but from those ill qualities which do so generally vitiate the Taste, and corrupt the Tempers of the great and mighty Men.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...