Skip to main content

Pray the Litany daily

It was theologian Andrew Davison who I first read suggesting that the Litany be prayed daily during this pandemic.  It is a recommendation that should be acted upon by Anglicans across the globe.  Other traditions have their means of encouraging prayer and intercession at this time. Pope Francis, for example, called for Roman Catholics to pray the Rosary with him on Thursday evening.  In the Anglican tradition, it is the Litany which has been our 'go to' in times in crisis, a holding up of individuals and communities, Church, commonwealth, and world in sustained intercession.

In their letter addressing the crisis, ++Canterbury and ++York urged "all clergy to continue their pattern of daily prayer" as "an offering of prayer and praise for the nation and the world".  We might be rather disappointed that they did not explicitly mention the Litany - which 1662 directs should be prayed "upon Sundays, Wednesdays, and Fridays" - but, after a generation of neglect of the Litany, this is hardly surprising.  However, it is in the Litany that we find a means of sustaining us in prayer "for the nation and the world".  And it is to the Litany that we should now turn daily.

Other resources or extemporary prayer will often lack both the comprehensiveness of the Litany and its robust theological underpinnings.  It is unlikely, for example, that other resources or extemporary prayer will petition - as does the Common Worship Litany - for deliverance "in the hour of death, and at the day of judgement".  Similarly, the manner in which the Litany grounds our intercession in the Holy Trinity and in the redemption wrought by Our Lord Jesus Christ is unlikely to find any significant or meaningful echo in other resources or extemporary prayer.  I refer here to the Common Worship form of the Litany to make the point that we should be praying the Litany in either its contemporary or traditional forms: the important issue is that we are praying in this sustained, comprehensive form.

In the absence of public worship at this time, the Litany also provides all Anglicans with a form of prayer and intercession that can easily be used in the home, in the garden, or an individual's walk.  Precisely because it does not rely on our own resources, insights, knowledge, or recollection, it provides a means of prayer for the nation and the world that gathers up before the Holy Trinity the needs of all.

There can be no doubt about the crisis that societies across the globe are now facing.  The threats to life and to the common good are serious.  The stress placed upon government, health services, and communities is immense.  The fear and uncertainty experienced by entire societies is palpable.  It is a time for the Church to pray earnestly, to uphold all these concerns - in a sustained, comprehensive manner - before the God who is Creator and Redeemer.  For Anglicans, this means the Litany.  So let us pray the Litany daily, that all may be preserved during and delivered from this time of tribulation.

(With thanks to Andrew Davison for issuing this call.)

Comments

  1. Sam Charles Norton20 March 2020 at 09:21

    Amen. Have you seen this: http://stmarksbr.org/litany-during-a-pandemic/ ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. laudable Practice20 March 2020 at 20:25

      Sam, many thanks for your comment. I had not seen the link - very interesting. I like its traditional 'feel'. My instinct is that it could be used alongside the Litany, rather than replacing it. (It does not, for example, pray for those in authority: very necessary at this time.) But, yes, a very useful supplement.

      Stay safe,
      Brian.

      Delete
  2. MarcA22 March 2020 at 15:08

    I like the Great Litany in the 1979 Episcopal PBk..more like Cranmer but less rooted in the world of the 16c

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. laudable Practice23 March 2020 at 07:00

      Marc, thank you for your comment although I am not entirely in agreement. I think a good case could be made for keeping the Litany rooted in the 16th century rather than the historically unusual circumstances of Western societies in the late 20th century, with their assumptions that civil and religious strife, pandemics, and sudden death are things of the past. The first 20 years of the 21st century indicate much greater continuity with the 16th century.

      That said, the Great Litany in TEC's BCP 1979 does follow Cranmer in some quite significant ways lost in other contemporary Litanies.

      Brian.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more