"If the Church of Rome would rest where they do": Bramhall on the Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox

Another extract from Bramhall's Discourse III: A Reply to the Bishop of Chalcedon (1656), a response to a work by the Roman titular Bishop of Chalcedon, in which he responds to the accusation that at the Reformation the ecclesia Anglicana broke communion with the "Eastern Churches".  Here Bramhall praises the Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox churches and states how the reformed ecclesia Anglicana is aligned to them in essential matters of Faith, sacraments, and discipline, and urges the See of Rome to follow the example of the Orthodox. (It is also worth noting that his inclusion of the Oriental Orthodox anticipates contemporary ecumenical dialogue with that noble tradition and communion.)

1. But for these Grecian, Russian, Armenian, and Abyssinian Churches, I find gross superstitions objected to some of them, but not proved. I find some inusitate [i.e. unfamiliar] expressions about some mysteries which are scarcely intelligible or explicable, as the Procession of the Holy Ghost, and the union of the Two Natures in Christ, which are not frequently used among us, but I believe their sense to be the same with ours. The Grecians do acknowledge the Holy Ghost to be the Spirit of the Son. And all the other Churches are ready to accurse the errors both of Nestorius and Eutyches. But that which satisfies me is this, that they exact of no man, nor obtrude upon him, any other creed, or new articles of Faith, than the Apostolic, Nicene, and Athanasian Creeds, with the explications of the general Councils of Ephesus, Constantinople, and Chalcedon, all which we readily admit and use daily in our liturgy. If the Church of Rome would rest where they do, we might well have disputable questions between us, but no breach of unity in point of faith.

2. Likewise in point of discipline, all these Churches ascribe no more to the Pope than a primacy of order, no supremacy of power or universal jurisdiction. They make a general Council, with or without the Pope's suffrage, to be the highest ecclesiastical tribunal. Let the Romanists rest where they do rest, and all our controversies concerning ecclesiastical discipline will fall to the ground. 

3. Thirdly, they have their liturgy in a language understood. They administer the Sacrament in both kinds to all Christians. They do not themselves adore, much less compel others to adore, the species of Bread and Wine (howsoever they have a kind of elevation)*. They have no new matter and form, no tradition of the Paten and Chalice in Presbyterian [i.e. presbyteral] Ordination, but only imposition of hands. They know no new Sacrifice, but the commemoration, representation, and application, of the Sacrifice of the Cross: just as we believe. Let the Romanists but imitate their moderation, and we shall straight come to join in communion, in Sacraments, and Sacramentals also. Yet these are the three essentials of Christian religion, Faith, Sacraments, and discipline. 

*It is interesting to note how Bramhall rightly distinguishes the "kind of elevation" in the Orthodox Divine Liturgy from its role and function in the Tridentine rite, and the absence of 'eucharistic adoration' as understood by Tridentine theology and practice.

From The Works of The Most Reverend Father in God, John Bramhall, Volume II.