Skip to main content

'A prayer excellent to the conclusion of a daily service': A Prayer of Saint Chrysostom at Matins and Evensong

When he reflects on the closing collect at Matins and Evensong in his A Critical and Practical Elucidation of the Morning and Evening Prayer of the Church of England (1796), John Shepherd's delight in the prayer is obvious:

This is called the prayer of St. Chrysostom, because it is almost literally taken out of a Greek Liturgy, commonly ascribed to him. The Church of England adopted it, and placed it here, not knowing where to find a prayer, or persons able to compose a prayer, more excellent, or better adapted to the conclusion of a daily service.

He points to how the Prayer of Saint Chrysostom grounds the efficacy of our prayers in the evangelical promises of Matthew 6:8 and 18:20, thus gathering up all our petitions at Matins and Evensong into these evangelical promises:

The preface contains two grounds and reasons for hoping, that our prayers will be accepted: Our present experience of God's grace, which has enabled us unanimously and devoutly to make our common, that is, our united supplications unto him. He who gave us this grace, we humbly trust, will grant our requests. But that we may not quit the throne of grace, till all doubt of the efficacy of our petitions is removed, we urge the infallible promise of him, who is the life and the truth, in whom all the promises of God are Yea and Amen, and who has assured us, that when two or three are gathered together in his name, he will grant their requests. We beg him to fulfil the desires of our hearts, and the petitions of our lips; but with this reserve, only so far as his infinite wisdom knows it expedient for us, learning from his example to submit our will to the will of God.

And it is on this basis that we make two petitions of the Prayer of Saint Chrysostom itself:

For two things however, without any apprehension of appearing arrogant, or presumptuous, we positively and importunately pray; the knowledge of all necessary religious truth in this world; and when we pass out of this world into the world to come, life everlasting: Being fully assured, that if these two points, the knowledge of God here, and the enjoyment of him hereafter be secured, every thing else is comparatively of little value.

Note how, as Shepherd carefully indicates, we pray for "the knowledge all necessary religious truth". Hence the respective petition in the Prayer is not 'granting us in this world knowledge of all thy truth'. Rather, we pray for "knowledge of thy truth": that is, that which is sufficient for our salvation. Indeed, the opening phrase "granting us in this world" brings to mind the Apostolic exhortation:

For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

There is, then, no 'knowledge of all thy truth' in this world. Our petition is, rightly, more modest, recognising that now, in this transitory life, we can but "know in part". 

The final petition, "and in the life of the world to come life everlasting", echoes the closing affirmations of both the Apostles' and Nicene Creed. That the Prayer of Saint Chrysostom thus ends with an expression of the Christian hope is a quietly beautiful way of bringing us at the close of Matins and Evensong to place our daily living in light of the fulfilment of all things. What is more, by using the modest language of the Creeds, it reminds us that the Christian hope is not about apocalyptic Enthusiasm but, rather, the call of the Apostle:

let us, who are of the day, be sober ... Wherefore comfort yourselves together, and edify one another, even as also ye do.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...