Skip to main content

'Clear proof, practical evidence': George Bull and Trinitarian minimalism

From A Vindication of the Church of England (published posthumously in 1719) by George Bull (received episcopal orders in 1651, during the Interregnum; Bishop of St. Davids, 1705-10), another significant feature of Trinitarian minimalism - the belief that Baptism in the Name of the Holy Trinity and the Trinitarian doxology in the liturgy is sufficient to sustain saving Trinitarian faith:

for as long as the sacrament of Baptism, as it was appointed by Christ to be administered, in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, shall continue in the church, (that is, whilst the church shall continue,) as long as the doxology, or glorification of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost together, (which was received in the catholic church in the very age that trod upon the heels of the apostles, as appears from the testimony of St. Justin Martyr and others,) shall retain a place in the Liturgy and public offices of the church, so long shall we not want a clear proof, and a practical evidence and demonstration that the Deity of the Holy Ghost, and so the consubstantiality of each Person in the most blessed Trinity, is a catholic verity. 

Bull echoed this in his Sermon XIII, 'Common Prayers ancient, useful, and necessary':

Such also is the doxology or glorification of the ever- blessed Trinity: "Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost." For they are much mistaken who think that this form was first set up in the Church of Christ against the Arian heresy: it was in use in the Churches of Christ from the beginning. Hence Justin Martyr, who lived very near to the Apostolic age, in his second Apology towards the end setting forth the public worship of Christians in his time, tells us, " In all our oblations" (i.e. in all our Eucharists) "we bless and praise the Maker of all things, by His Son Jesus Christ, and by the Holy Ghost" ... 

But the truth is, this doxology was not occasionally taken up in opposition to any heresy, but is an essential part of Christian worship, necessary to be used always by all Christians, if there had never been any heresy in the world. For all Christians are baptized in, or into, "the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost," i.e. into the faith, service, and worship of the holy Trinity, and so from their very Baptism are obliged to render and give to each person divine worship and adoration.

Bull continues by again emphasising the significance of the doxology in the Prayer Book liturgy. Indeed, he suggests that this has even greater weight than liturgical use of the Creeds in rooting us in Trinitarian faith:

the Liturgy of our Church comes behind none of the ancient Liturgies. For therein we are obliged to confess the faith of all the ancient Creeds. But more especially our frequent doxologies to the most holy and ever-blessed Trinity, do abundantly secure us against Arianism and Socinianism, the prevailing heresies of our unhappy times, and of all other heresies the most dangerous. In short, no heretic can heartily join in the offices of prayer and praise, and confessions of faith, prescribed in the Liturgy of our Church.

It is these basic Christian practices of Baptism in the Triune name and praise of the Holy Trinity - and not in what Bull calls elsewhere "the labyrinths of the schoolmen" - that the Church's confession of the Trinitarian faith is to be found. This is a particular strength of Trinitarian minimalism. Trinitarian faith flows from and is dependent upon ordinary, normative Christian practices, not philosophical speculation and intricate terminology. Here is what is sufficient for the nourishing and sustaining of Trinitarian faith. It is, in other words, an invitation to contemporary Anglicans to recover a confidence in the inherently Trinitarian nature of these basic Christian practices at the heart of common prayer. To confess and adore the Holy Trinity is not the preserve of an exclusive, speculative elite knowledge: it is the very basic stuff of praying and worshipping as Anglican Christians.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...