Skip to main content

'Reading the holy Scriptures is a duty expressly commanded us': encouraging the confident reading of Scripture

Reading and hearing the word of God are but the several circumstances of the same duty: instrumental especially to faith, but consequently to all other graces of the spirit ... The Scriptures read are the same thing to us which the same doctrine was when it was preached by the disciples of our blessed Lord, and we are to learn of either with the same dispositions ... The Holy Ghost is certainly the best preacher in the world, and the words of Scripture the best sermons. All the doctrine of salvation is plainly set down there, that the most unlearned person, by hearing it read, may understand all his duty ... The wit of man cannot more plainly tell us our duty, or more fully, than the Holy Ghost hath done already. Good sermons and good books are of excellent use; but yet they can serve no other end but that we practice the plain doctrines of Scripture ... Set apart some portion of thy time, according to the opportunities of thy calling and necessary employment, for the reading of Holy Scriptures; and, if it be possible, every day read or hear some of it read: you are sure that book teaches all truth, commands all holiness, and promises all happiness.

Jeremy Taylor's words from Holy Living came to mind when reading a powerful article entitled 'Loving the Bible', on the Covenant site, by Barbara White, a priest in TEC:

Just as there is no such thing as a solitary Christian, there is no such thing as a Christian who is not steeped, formed, and shaped by the Word of God. Holy Scripture must be the air we breathe and the water in which we swim. It is the soil out of which our liturgy, theology, and mission need to grow. It is the primary way that we who desire to be disciples of Jesus Christ come to encounter him, not as an artifact of history, but as the risen, living, and reigning Son of God.

This confidence in Scripture, and unembarrassed affirmation that it is "the primary way that we who desire to be disciples of Jesus Christ come to encounter him", is deeply, truly, profoundly Anglican. Taylor's words - the words of a committed Laudian - certainly testify to this. No revivalist, deeply committed to the liturgy and divine service, regarding "The holy communion, or supper of the Lord, [as] the most sacred, mysterious, and useful conjugation of secret and holy things and duties in the religion", Taylor nevertheless declared that "reading the holy Scriptures is a duty expressly commanded us", for "nothing else is the word of God that we know of by any certain instrument".

I invoke Taylor here because the piety he sought to encourage has, in many ways, defined the Anglican character over centuries: eirenic, modest, cautious about zeal, critiquing Enthusiasm, emphasising the duties of the Christian. Such piety, however, is - Taylor explicitly asserts - to be necessarily rooted in regular reading of Scripture: for without this, our duties towards God and neighbour can cease to be rooted in "the doctrine of salvation ... plainly set down" in Scripture, and then whither, devoid of true nourishment. That personal reading of Scripture is often not the practice of Anglicans in North Atlantic societies, is, as White states, something that must be acknowledged and addressed:

We have a Bible-reading problem in American Christianity. Too many mainline churches, preachers, and teachers ignore the Bible at best, or treat it as something awkward, embarrassing, or as a “text of terror.”

This state of affairs is no minor matter.  It can undermine Christian life, witness, and ministry for, in Taylor's words, "The Holy Ghost is certainly the best preacher in the world, and the words of Scripture the best sermons". It also fundamentally contradicts the vision of the Christian life set forth in the Book of Common Prayer.

The very purpose of Morning and Evening Prayer, according to Cranmer, is to enable "often reading and meditation in God's Word". In the Litany, we petition that bishops and clergy would be granted "true knowledge and understanding of thy Word". We pray also in the Litany that all Christians would "hear meekly thy Word, and ... receive it with pure affection", and that we all might have grace "to amend our lives according to thy holy Word". At the Holy Communion, we again petition that bishops and clergy would "set forth thy true and lively Word", and that "all thy People ... may hear and receive thy holy Word". And, of course, at the ordination of priests, the newly-ordained receive the holy Scriptures with the primary charge to "preach the Word of God". (This, by the way, remains the primary charge in the rite for the ordination of priests in, for example, TEC's BCP 1979.)

Reading and hearing the Scriptures, then, is fundamental to the Prayer Book's vision of what it is to be the Church and of what it is to be Christian. The personal reading of Scripture both flows from and is ordered towards the corporate hearing of Scripture in its reading and exposition in divine service. We are drawn to drink more deeply from the Scriptures through corporate hearing and exposition; through personal reading of the Scriptures our hearts, minds, and souls are prepared for corporate reading and exposition. 

... you are sure that book teaches all truth, commands all holiness, and promises all happiness.

Mindful of the current state of Anglicanism in North Atlantic societies, when countless initiatives, projects, programs, and statements have (entirely predictably) failed to have had any meaningful impact on the life of the churches - never mind the cultures in which we live, minister, and witness - perhaps we might set aside all those various schemes beloved of ecclesiastical bureaucrats, and have one, clear, simple, confident focus within Anglican and Episcopal churches over the next generation: to encourage the personal reading of the Scriptures. No, it would not in any way be a quick-fix. It would not quickly undo decades of teaching which undermined confidence in the Faith, Scriptures, and Creeds. Nor it would not in any way be an automatic answer to vast cultural and social challenges. But it would enrich our confession and witness, rooting both more fully, more confidently in holy Scripture, in that which is "God's Word written".

In the beautiful words of the homily 'A Fruitful exhortation to the reading and knowledge of Holy Scripture':

Let us hear, read, and know these holy rules, injunctions, and statutes of our Christian religion, and upon that we have made profession to God at our baptism. Let us with fear and reverence lay up (in the chest of our hearts) these necessary and fruitful lessons. Let us night and day muse, and have meditation and contemplation in them. Let us ruminate, and (as it were) chew the cud, that we may have the sweet juice, spiritual effect, marrow, honey, kernel, taste, comfort and consolation of them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

'Whether the Lutheran Churches have right Ordinations and perfect succession of Bishops': Jeremy Taylor, 'Episcopacy Asserted', and Lutheran orders

Amidst the bitter controversies over episcopacy in the Three Kingdoms during the early 1640s, controversies which had become war in Scotland in 1637 and then in England in 1642, Jeremy Taylor wrote his Laudian defence of episcopal order, The Sacred Order and Offices of Episcopacy Asserted and Maintained . He proposed in this work that the non-episcopal Reformed churches could have had episcopally-ordered clergy: Those good people might have had order from the bishops of England or the Lutheran churches, if at least they thought our churches catholic and Christian. Leaving aside the reality that, for example, French Protestants would have been placed in an invidious political position if they had done as Taylor proposed, it is the reference to "the Lutheran churches" which is significant.  To begin with, a large portion of the Lutheran churches - those in the German lands - were governed by a system of superintendency. It is almost inconceivable that Taylor was not aware of th...