Skip to main content

'Views sustained in the Church of England, and in this Church': William White's 'Commentaries Suited to Occasions of Ordination', early PECUSA, and 18th century Anglicanism

Over the next few months, laudable Practice will have a weekly post considering extracts from William White's Commentaries Suited to Occasions of Ordination. This was published as a single volume in 1833, but first appeared in the Quarterly Theological Magazine and Religious Repository in 1813/14. The request for publication as a single volume came unanimously from White's fellow bishops, during the 1832 General Convention: "we do earnestly recommend such an edition of that work to the patronage of all the Clergy and Members generally of the Church". 

There are at least three reasons why we might give consideration to White's Commentaries Suited to Occasions of Ordination. Firstly, the unanimous request from the House of Bishops is suggestive of how White's understanding of ordained ministry appealed to both the Old High and Evangelical traditions within early PECUSA. Secondly, the year of publication, 1833, also has obvious importance: the work points to a widely supported understanding of ordained ministry on the cusp of the Oxford Movement. Thirdly, it can contribute to a recognition of White's significance to early PECUSA. Too much popular commentary from within and outside TEC is concerned with Seabury and what I have previously termed 'the Scottish myth'. White and his theological debt to the Church of England, however, were much more influential in shaping PECUSA than Seabury and Scottish Episcopalianism. 

This debt to the Church of England is explicitly stated in White's preface to the work:

The other cause of regret, was, in some ministers, deviations from the clear senses of those answers in the services, which give the pledge of adherence to our liturgy; and of submission to an authority recognized by our system of ecclesiastical government, and by the canons. It is impossible, that this conduct can be vindicated by any professions of piety, supposing them to be sincere; but I must declare the opinion, that it has been chiefly owing either to vanity, or, under the most favourable circumstances, of views of the dispensation of grace, differing from those sustained in the Church of England, and in this Church. The most favourable interpretation to be put on such cases, is that the parties, perhaps insensibly to themselves, have no preference of our ministry, otherwise than as a door to our Churches, not otherwise to be entered.

Notice, indeed, how White first refers to the Church of England and then to "this Church". This reflected the similarly unembarrassed references to the Church of England in the Preface to the PECUSA BCP 1789 and in early PECUSA preaching. Here in these words White quite clearly refers to the Church of England as the doctrinal norm for early PECUSA.

In doing so, White perhaps adds another reason for us to give consideration to this work. White - born in 1748, received orders in 1770, consecrated to the episcopate in 1787 - was very much a product of 18th century Anglicanism. The fact that the first form of this work was published in the very last years of the 'long 18th century' - 1814/15 - only adds to the sense that it gives us insight into the Anglicanism of that century. And it is also fitting that the single volume edition of the work was published in 1833, the year in which a movement emerged with a desire to reject and undo 18th century Anglicanism. White's Commentaries Suited to Occasions of Ordination, therefore, in addition to offering us insight into early PECUSA, can also contribute to a renewed understanding of the theological strengths of 18th century Anglicanism. 

White ends the preface by noting how he expected candidates for holy orders to read the work:

if read in retirement, with meditation and prayer, the intended effect would be thus the most likely to be accomplished.

In itself, it is a rather lovely and quite moving sign of the oft-dismissed piety of 18th century Anglicanism, a victim of - to use a phrase from the Marxist historian E.P Thompson - "the enormous condescension of posterity". Perhaps readers of the various posts in this series might approach "with meditation and prayer" the various extracts, reflecting on what White's words mean for both contemporary Anglicanism and Episcopalianism, and for our own ministries and vocations.

(The image is an 1829 portrait of "The Right Rev. William White, D.D. Senior Bishop of The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States and Bishop of the Diocese of Pennsylvania".)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...