Skip to main content

'Repose and toleration in the maternal bosom of Christian charity': the Burkean vision of 18th century Anglican comprehension

In a 1773 speech, Edmund Burke responded to a petition, laid before the House of Commons, from a Methodist congregation, opposing a Bill for the Relief of Protestant Dissenters, perhaps on the grounds that many Dissenting congregations had become heterodox. The petition claimed that the defence of the Church of England (from which Methodism had not yet legally separated) was incompatible with toleration for such Dissenting congregations. 

Burke's response, rejecting and refuting the assumptions of the petition, offered not only a defence of toleration ("I would have toleration a part of establishment, as a principle favorable to Christianity, and as a part of Christianity") but also an account of the principled comprehension of 18th century Anglicanism, defined by the generous orthodoxy of the Articles ("the security of her own doctrines"), as a confident, robust, and meaningful alternative to sectarianism:

Sir, the Church of England, if only defended by this miserable petition upon your table, must, I am afraid, upon the principles of true fortification, be soon destroyed. But, fortunately, her walls, bulwarks, and bastions are constructed of other materials than of stubble and straw, - are built up with the strong and stable matter of the gospel of liberty, and founded on a true, constitutional, legal establishment. But, Sir, she has other securities: she has the security of her own doctrines; she has the security of the piety, the sanctity, of her own professors, - their learning is a bulwark to defend her ... 

I wish to see the Established Church of England great and powerful; I wish to see her foundations laid low and deep, that she may crush the giant powers of rebellious darkness; I would have her head raised up to that heaven to which she conducts us. I would have her open wide her hospitable gates by a noble and liberal* comprehension, but I would have no breaches in her wall** ...

(*'Liberal' is defined in Johnson's dictionary as "munificent; generous; bountiful; not parsimonious".
**A reference to Burke's defence of clerical subscription to the Articles of Religion.)

Such "noble and liberal comprehension" within Anglicanism is a consistent theme in Burke's thinking. It was also widely reflected in the self-understanding of 18th century Anglicanism. Consider, for example, the charge given by Charles Inglis to the clergy of his new Diocese of Nova Scotia in 1788:

It is truly painful and mortifying to see a furious Bigot, pretending a zeal for the Gospel; yet wholly destitute of that temper required by the Gospel, and ignorant of the two first and principal lessons taught by it, Humility and Benevolence ... The members of our Church have always been distinguished by liberal sentiments - may they ever continue to be so distinguished.

Burke continues by highlighting the wider cultural significance of such peaceable, gracious comprehension:

I would have her cherish all those who are within, and pity all those who are without; I would have her a common blessing to the world, an example, if not an instructor, to those who have not the happiness to belong to her; I would have her give a lesson of peace to mankind, that a vexed and wandering generation might be taught to seek for repose and toleration in the maternal bosom of Christian charity, and not in the harlot lap of infidelity and indifference. Nothing has driven people more into that house of seduction than the mutual hatred of Christian congregations.

Anglican comprehension, therefore, is to "give a lesson of peace" in place of sectarian strife and contention. This too was a well-established theme in 18th century Anglicanism. As the High Church Bishop Horsley declared in an episcopal charge of 1800:

I know not what hinders but that the highest Supralapsarian Calvinist may be as good a churchman as an Arminian; and if the Church of England in her moderation opens her arms to both, neither can with a very good grace desire that the other should be excluded.

The Burkean vision of "a noble and liberal comprehension", flowing from and returning to the "repose and toleration ... of Christian charity", provides not only a significant insight into 18th century Anglicanism - it also recalls contemporary Anglicans to a meaningful comprehension, a comprehension that is radically different to a banal invocation of diversity and inclusion: a comprehension rooted in a recognition of the gift of charity bestowed in and through Christ, and in a modesty required in the face of the fallibility of ecclesiastical institutions and schools of theological thought. This is to overflow in a gracious generosity towards other Christian traditions, those whom Burke in this speech describes as "the honest and candid disciples of the religion we profess in common".

It is certainly the case that Burke's words regarding a "vexed and wandering generation" have deep contemporary resonance, and that the "mutual hatred of Christian congregations" continues to be destructive of Christian cultural presence and witness. Heeding Burkean wisdom, therefore, we might offer a peaceable, gracious alternative to sectarianism, a "repose and toleration in the maternal bosom of Christian charity".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

'Whether the Lutheran Churches have right Ordinations and perfect succession of Bishops': Jeremy Taylor, 'Episcopacy Asserted', and Lutheran orders

Amidst the bitter controversies over episcopacy in the Three Kingdoms during the early 1640s, controversies which had become war in Scotland in 1637 and then in England in 1642, Jeremy Taylor wrote his Laudian defence of episcopal order, The Sacred Order and Offices of Episcopacy Asserted and Maintained . He proposed in this work that the non-episcopal Reformed churches could have had episcopally-ordered clergy: Those good people might have had order from the bishops of England or the Lutheran churches, if at least they thought our churches catholic and Christian. Leaving aside the reality that, for example, French Protestants would have been placed in an invidious political position if they had done as Taylor proposed, it is the reference to "the Lutheran churches" which is significant.  To begin with, a large portion of the Lutheran churches - those in the German lands - were governed by a system of superintendency. It is almost inconceivable that Taylor was not aware of th...