Skip to main content

The Advent of High Church populism

Everyone is welcome to attend the popular service, with doors opening at 4pm. The service lasts for just over an hour. 

Please be seated by 5pm. We cannot guarantee admission after 5pm. Seats are unreserved and are on a first come first serve basis. 

So said a local website advertising "things to do in York" last weekend, referring to the Advent Procession in the Minster.  Doors opening at 4pm for a service commencing at 5:15pm; seats first come, first served; admission not guaranteed after 5pm.  Such warnings are not exactly routine for Anglican acts of worship in England.

On Saturday past, the Daily Mail reported ahead of the Advent Procession in Salisbury Cathedral, held at 7pm on the eve of Advent and 5pm on Advent Sunday:

Around 1,700 worshippers queue for hours to see the beautiful spectacle.

The fact that the Advent Procession resonates in a culture routinely described and defined as 'secular' is worthy of some reflection.  This is a liturgy marked by carols, readings, and prayers - often concluding with Cranmer's majestic Advent collect - full of eschatological references.   In other words, a liturgy centred around the creedal confession of the Last Judgement - a theme which the past few generations of theology have sought to 'de-mythologise' and immanentize - has, quite literally, people queuing to get in.

Now, no, I am not suggesting that this is what actively, consciously draws people in such large numbers to the Advent Procession: but it does not, clearly, repel them.  Something about this liturgy, with its eschatological focus, a focus embodied in the contrast between light and darkness in the liturgy, resonates in a way that generations of demythologising theology denied could be possible in the secular city.

Comparison with the Nine Lessons and Carols is instructive.  Both contain weighty readings from Scripture.  Both employ hymnody traditional in form and content.  Both are centred upon dogmatic truths of the Creeds.  Both make use of the seasonal Prayer Book collects, which give prayerful expressions to those dogmatic truths. And both echo John Milbank's description of the coherence of the Anglican patrimony:

sturdily incarnated in land, parish ... yet sublimely aspiring in its verbal, musical and visual performances.

Both also emerged from the High Church tradition.  The Nine Lessons and Carols, of course, is associated with Edward White Benson and George Somerset Walpole.  Benson's son, Arthur, was to write that his father's preference was for liturgy "done in the most seemly way but without elaborate ritual".  He described his father administering the Sacrament as a priest:

there was nothing that could be called ritual, only a beautiful solemnity and decorum. He always wore a full long English surplice, and bands.

Similarly, when Walpole was elected Bishop of Edinburgh, The Times described him as "a moderate High Churchman".  If we wanted evidence of the vitality of the High Church tradition post-1833, we might well then point to the emergence of the Nine Lessons and Carols as perhaps the most popular and resonant Anglican liturgical act.  For while Ritualists were introducing Benediction in their parishes (a spirituality only ever appealing to a small minority), and Evangelicals were founding the Keswick Convention (likewise appealing to but a small minority), it was the High Church tradition which established the Nine Lessons and Carols as a popular means of celebrating and reflecting upon the Incarnation.

While the Advent Procession is a more recent development in Anglican liturgy, it is an expression of - to again use words from Milbank - the renewal in English cathedrals over recent decades of "High Church populist, festive and educational practices", contrasting with both Evangelical and Anglo-Catholic emphases. 

The High Church populism of the Advent Procession and the Nine Lessons and Carols is a significant reminder that two oft-repeated criticisms of the High Church tradition - that it is elitist and culturally irrelevant - are, to say the least, misrepresentations.  This populism, of course, sits very uneasily with those who (from a range of perspectives) promote a rather sectarian vision of the future of North Atlantic Anglicanism: smaller, purer, 'counter-cultural', purged of 'cultural Christianity' (as if it is possible for Christianity not to be embedded in culture).  The resonance of the Advent Procession and the Nine Lessons and Carols demonstrates that this need not be the Anglican future.  That, in fact, Anglicanism's historic vocation of gathering up and sanctifying cultural and social life can bear fruit, even in a secular age.  Of course, much more needs to be done - and needs to be done better, with greater confidence, and deeper (and more orthodox) theological conviction.  But an Anglicanism seeking resonance in a secular age needs the populist wisdom and practices of the High Church tradition.

Comments

  1. Actually the origin of the Nine Lessons is medieval. Mattins of The Nativity has nine lessons instead of three. All major Feasts had nine lessons in the monastic office.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many thanks for your comment. I totally accept the point that Mattins may have provided a medieval antecedent for the Advent Procession and Nine Lessons & Carols, but this does not mean that the emergence of these two services from the High Church tradition is denied. In many ways, it reflects a core Prayer Book principle - a 'democratising' of the monastic cycle of prayer, making it 'common'.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...